linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: glider@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: kfence: Fix false positives on big endian
Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 09:43:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNOmtTU=__W7=pKVibVZ3OnfgSsXeSsqHA7y=e3D-G026Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230505035127.195387-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au>

On Fri, 5 May 2023 at 05:51, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>
> Since commit 1ba3cbf3ec3b ("mm: kfence: improve the performance of
> __kfence_alloc() and __kfence_free()"), kfence reports failures in
> random places at boot on big endian machines.
>
> The problem is that the new KFENCE_CANARY_PATTERN_U64 encodes the
> address of each byte in its value, so it needs to be byte swapped on big
> endian machines.
>
> The compiler is smart enough to do the le64_to_cpu() at compile time, so
> there is no runtime overhead.
>
> Fixes: 1ba3cbf3ec3b ("mm: kfence: improve the performance of __kfence_alloc() and __kfence_free()")
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>

Andrew, is the Fixes enough to make it to stable as well or do we also
need Cc: stable?

Thanks,
-- Marco

> ---
>  mm/kfence/kfence.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kfence/kfence.h b/mm/kfence/kfence.h
> index 2aafc46a4aaf..392fb273e7bd 100644
> --- a/mm/kfence/kfence.h
> +++ b/mm/kfence/kfence.h
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
>   * canary of every 8 bytes is the same. 64-bit memory can be filled and checked
>   * at a time instead of byte by byte to improve performance.
>   */
> -#define KFENCE_CANARY_PATTERN_U64 ((u64)0xaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ^ (u64)(0x0706050403020100))
> +#define KFENCE_CANARY_PATTERN_U64 ((u64)0xaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ^ (u64)(le64_to_cpu(0x0706050403020100)))
>
>  /* Maximum stack depth for reports. */
>  #define KFENCE_STACK_DEPTH 64
> --
> 2.40.1
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-05  7:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-05  3:51 Michael Ellerman
2023-05-05  7:14 ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-05-05  7:43 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2023-05-05 11:56   ` Michael Ellerman
2023-05-05 16:02 ` David Laight
2023-05-17 22:20   ` Andrew Morton
2023-05-19  5:14     ` Michael Ellerman
2023-05-19  6:29       ` Benjamin Gray
2023-05-19  5:40     ` Christophe Leroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANpmjNOmtTU=__W7=pKVibVZ3OnfgSsXeSsqHA7y=e3D-G026Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox