From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: andrey.konovalov@linux.dev
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kasan, slub: fix HW_TAGS zeroing with slub_debug
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 14:50:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNO+spktteYZezk7PGLFOyoeuFyziKiU-1GXbpeyKLZLPg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <678ac92ab790dba9198f9ca14f405651b97c8502.1688561016.git.andreyknvl@google.com>
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 at 14:44, <andrey.konovalov@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
>
> Commit 946fa0dbf2d8 ("mm/slub: extend redzone check to extra allocated
> kmalloc space than requested") added precise kmalloc redzone poisoning
> to the slub_debug functionality.
>
> However, this commit didn't account for HW_TAGS KASAN fully initializing
> the object via its built-in memory initialization feature. Even though
> HW_TAGS KASAN memory initialization contains special memory initialization
> handling for when slub_debug is enabled, it does not account for in-object
> slub_debug redzones. As a result, HW_TAGS KASAN can overwrite these
> redzones and cause false-positive slub_debug reports.
>
> To fix the issue, avoid HW_TAGS KASAN memory initialization when slub_debug
> is enabled altogether. Implement this by moving the __slub_debug_enabled
> check to slab_post_alloc_hook. Common slab code seems like a more
> appropriate place for a slub_debug check anyway.
>
> Fixes: 946fa0dbf2d8 ("mm/slub: extend redzone check to extra allocated kmalloc space than requested")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Is it fixing this issue:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230628154714.GB22090@willie-the-truck/
Or some other issue?
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Other than the question above, it looks sane:
Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> ---
> mm/kasan/kasan.h | 12 ------------
> mm/slab.h | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/kasan.h b/mm/kasan/kasan.h
> index b799f11e45dc..2e973b36fe07 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/kasan.h
> +++ b/mm/kasan/kasan.h
> @@ -466,18 +466,6 @@ static inline void kasan_unpoison(const void *addr, size_t size, bool init)
>
> if (WARN_ON((unsigned long)addr & KASAN_GRANULE_MASK))
> return;
> - /*
> - * Explicitly initialize the memory with the precise object size to
> - * avoid overwriting the slab redzone. This disables initialization in
> - * the arch code and may thus lead to performance penalty. This penalty
> - * does not affect production builds, as slab redzones are not enabled
> - * there.
> - */
> - if (__slub_debug_enabled() &&
> - init && ((unsigned long)size & KASAN_GRANULE_MASK)) {
> - init = false;
> - memzero_explicit((void *)addr, size);
> - }
> size = round_up(size, KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE);
>
> hw_set_mem_tag_range((void *)addr, size, tag, init);
> diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
> index 6a5633b25eb5..9c0e09d0f81f 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.h
> +++ b/mm/slab.h
> @@ -723,6 +723,7 @@ static inline void slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s,
> unsigned int orig_size)
> {
> unsigned int zero_size = s->object_size;
> + bool kasan_init = init;
> size_t i;
>
> flags &= gfp_allowed_mask;
> @@ -739,6 +740,17 @@ static inline void slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s,
> (s->flags & SLAB_KMALLOC))
> zero_size = orig_size;
>
> + /*
> + * When slub_debug is enabled, avoid memory initialization integrated
> + * into KASAN and instead zero out the memory via the memset below with
> + * the proper size. Otherwise, KASAN might overwrite SLUB redzones and
> + * cause false-positive reports. This does not lead to a performance
> + * penalty on production builds, as slub_debug is not intended to be
> + * enabled there.
> + */
> + if (__slub_debug_enabled())
> + kasan_init = false;
> +
> /*
> * As memory initialization might be integrated into KASAN,
> * kasan_slab_alloc and initialization memset must be
> @@ -747,8 +759,8 @@ static inline void slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s,
> * As p[i] might get tagged, memset and kmemleak hook come after KASAN.
> */
> for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> - p[i] = kasan_slab_alloc(s, p[i], flags, init);
> - if (p[i] && init && !kasan_has_integrated_init())
> + p[i] = kasan_slab_alloc(s, p[i], flags, kasan_init);
> + if (p[i] && init && (!kasan_init || !kasan_has_integrated_init()))
> memset(p[i], 0, zero_size);
> kmemleak_alloc_recursive(p[i], s->object_size, 1,
> s->flags, flags);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-05 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-05 12:44 andrey.konovalov
2023-07-05 12:50 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2023-07-05 13:19 ` Andrey Konovalov
2023-07-06 9:03 ` Will Deacon
2023-07-10 9:53 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANpmjNO+spktteYZezk7PGLFOyoeuFyziKiU-1GXbpeyKLZLPg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrey.konovalov@linux.dev \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox