From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kasan: fix more unit tests with CONFIG_UBSAN_LOCAL_BOUNDS enabled
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 12:20:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNMfemciY2Qn7aZ1Z0EvTA21CqZ6zei+dncGMedWr0-6cQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220219012643.892158-1-pcc@google.com>
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 at 02:26, Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com> wrote:
>
> This is a followup to commit f649dc0e0d7b ("kasan: fix unit tests
> with CONFIG_UBSAN_LOCAL_BOUNDS enabled") that fixes tests that fail
> as a result of __alloc_size annotations being added to the kernel
> allocator functions.
>
> Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/I4334cafc5db600fda5cebb851b2ee9fd09fb46cc
> Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.16.x
> Fixes: c37495d6254c ("slab: add __alloc_size attributes for better bounds checking")
> ---
> lib/test_kasan.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_kasan.c b/lib/test_kasan.c
> index 26a5c9007653..3bf8801d0e66 100644
> --- a/lib/test_kasan.c
> +++ b/lib/test_kasan.c
> @@ -177,7 +177,8 @@ static void kmalloc_node_oob_right(struct kunit *test)
> */
> static void kmalloc_pagealloc_oob_right(struct kunit *test)
> {
> - char *ptr;
> + /* See comment in kasan_global_oob_right. */
> + char *volatile ptr;
> size_t size = KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE + 10;
I think more recently we've been using OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR() to hide
things from the compiler. Does OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr) right before
the access also work in this case?
I leave it to you which you think is cleaner - I'm guessing that we
might want to avoid volatile if we can.
> KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_SLUB);
> @@ -272,7 +273,8 @@ static void kmalloc_large_oob_right(struct kunit *test)
> static void krealloc_more_oob_helper(struct kunit *test,
> size_t size1, size_t size2)
> {
> - char *ptr1, *ptr2;
> + /* See comment in kasan_global_oob_right. */
> + char *ptr1, *volatile ptr2;
> size_t middle;
>
> KUNIT_ASSERT_LT(test, size1, size2);
> @@ -304,7 +306,8 @@ static void krealloc_more_oob_helper(struct kunit *test,
> static void krealloc_less_oob_helper(struct kunit *test,
> size_t size1, size_t size2)
> {
> - char *ptr1, *ptr2;
> + /* See comment in kasan_global_oob_right. */
> + char *ptr1, *volatile ptr2;
> size_t middle;
>
> KUNIT_ASSERT_LT(test, size2, size1);
> --
> 2.35.1.473.g83b2b277ed-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-21 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-19 1:26 Peter Collingbourne
2022-02-21 11:20 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2022-02-24 0:21 ` Peter Collingbourne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANpmjNMfemciY2Qn7aZ1Z0EvTA21CqZ6zei+dncGMedWr0-6cQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox