From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Shaobo Huang <huangshaobo6@huawei.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, chenzefeng2@huawei.com,
dvyukov@google.com, glider@google.com,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, nixiaoming@huawei.com, wangbing6@huawei.com,
wangfangpeng1@huawei.com, young.liuyang@huawei.com,
zengweilin@huawei.com, zhongjubin@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kfence: check kfence canary in panic and reboot
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 10:50:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNMAT_DaiOoz=k6Z13nVR_2A_5fck12h0JKQSmNQRSKwGg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220421083715.45380-1-huangshaobo6@huawei.com>
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 at 10:37, Shaobo Huang <huangshaobo6@huawei.com> wrote:
[...]
> > > static int __init kfence_debugfs_init(void)
> > > {
> > > struct dentry *kfence_dir = debugfs_create_dir("kfence", NULL);
> > > @@ -806,6 +832,8 @@ static void kfence_init_enable(void)
> > >
> > > WRITE_ONCE(kfence_enabled, true);
> > > queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &kfence_timer, 0);
> > > + register_reboot_notifier(&kfence_check_canary_notifier);
> > > + atomic_notifier_chain_register(&panic_notifier_list, &kfence_check_canary_notifier);
> >
> > Executing this on panic is reasonable. However,
> > register_reboot_notifier() tells me this is being executed on *every*
> > reboot (not just panic). I think that's not what we want, because that
> > may increase reboot latency depending on how many KFENCE objects we
> > have. Is it possible to *only* do the check on panic?
>
> if oob occurs before reboot, reboot can also detect it, if not, the detection will be missing in this scenario.
> reboot and panic are two scenarios of system reset, so I think both scenarios need to be added.
That doesn't quite answer my question, why do you want to run the
check during normal reboot? As I understand it right now it will run
on any normal reboot, and also on panics. I have concerns adding these
checks to normal reboots because it may increase normal reboot
latency, which we do not want.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-21 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-20 10:49 Shaobo Huang
2022-04-20 11:11 ` Marco Elver
2022-04-21 8:37 ` Shaobo Huang
2022-04-21 8:50 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2022-04-21 9:12 ` Shaobo Huang
2022-04-21 10:03 ` Alexander Potapenko
2022-04-21 12:10 ` Shaobo Huang
2022-04-21 13:06 ` Alexander Potapenko
2022-04-21 13:28 ` Marco Elver
2022-04-21 13:46 ` Shaobo Huang
2022-04-24 8:10 ` Shaobo Huang
2022-04-24 9:51 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANpmjNMAT_DaiOoz=k6Z13nVR_2A_5fck12h0JKQSmNQRSKwGg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chenzefeng2@huawei.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=huangshaobo6@huawei.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nixiaoming@huawei.com \
--cc=wangbing6@huawei.com \
--cc=wangfangpeng1@huawei.com \
--cc=young.liuyang@huawei.com \
--cc=zengweilin@huawei.com \
--cc=zhongjubin@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox