From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kernelci-results@groups.io, bot@kernelci.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: next/master bisection: baseline.login on qemu_arm64-virt-gicv3-uefi
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 20:02:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANk7y0gBRgJQqeqXZmTXygKREUWn4OQ2cbTYqh5P9gN3ZSV2sQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ce67bde-3bd4-4a59-bce7-4a2764445783@sirena.org.uk>
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 7:34 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 10:16:21AM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 8:36 AM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > > The KernelCI bisection bot found a boot regression n today's -next on
> > > qemu arm64 UEFI platforms with 64K pages which was bisected to commit
> > > 1dad391daef1 ("bpf, arm64: use bpf_prog_pack for memory management").
> > > We OOM quite early in boot:
>
> > IIUC, 64kB pages means 512MB PMD. I think that's indeed too big. We
> > will need some logic to limit such cases.
As far as I understand, we need the prog pack to be PMD sized so it is
allocated as a huge page
and if we limit this then vmalloc() will not allocate a huge page and
the performance benefit will be lost.
>
> These qemu instances are only configured with 1G of RAM so that's rather
> large indeed.
I was able to reproduce this without UEFI as well, I used 600MB in
place of 1G. Prog pack tries to
allocate 512 MB and this causes the OOM panic.
Can we implement this in a way where if the memory can't be allocated
then we fallback to allocating less
memory rather than panicking. I don't know enough memory management to
know how it would be done.
Thanks,
Puranjay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-07 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <65e9e748.a70a0220.606f7.53c0@mx.google.com>
2024-03-07 16:36 ` Mark Brown
2024-03-07 18:16 ` Song Liu
2024-03-07 18:34 ` Mark Brown
2024-03-07 19:02 ` Puranjay Mohan [this message]
2024-03-07 23:00 ` Song Liu
2024-03-08 12:12 ` Puranjay Mohan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANk7y0gBRgJQqeqXZmTXygKREUWn4OQ2cbTYqh5P9gN3ZSV2sQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=puranjay12@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bot@kernelci.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kernelci-results@groups.io \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox