From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56318C11D04 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1465F24656 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Ry1+5B0k" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1465F24656 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B18906B0005; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 04:37:19 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id ACA3E6B0006; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 04:37:19 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9DF006B0007; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 04:37:19 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D766B0005 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 04:37:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin23.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D196124 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:37:19 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76510002198.23.bead65_3fdd38707b604 X-HE-Tag: bead65_3fdd38707b604 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3491 Received: from mail-lf1-f66.google.com (mail-lf1-f66.google.com [209.85.167.66]) by imf46.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf1-f66.google.com with SMTP id 7so1048827lfz.11 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:37:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KtNE7R1cdzCgHkHKWaIDSRv/qlQEr1YAvY7nMPkuk3E=; b=Ry1+5B0ku60NPbwBKgGCnuePw+cTx/ek7sW352LJcn8GbGrHTAcNzmTlA/NDM3t/mV S3TTYcV6QyTgFknQD2AnJGiRgVo96WZNrX0PB4iElIh7eYy6mU3/S9EUWr91PM/KOtiA dB2cmmLMY8DV5AK5GeLhf92jeaZNd5CZWSajL06XvYOe65dKAKZTWErzx5/NwOFrhQOV CqGY45IDazBJPe/lSyLwZSqL3AyYU/JvoUjc+ycYLsXpsvxlgoXhn9XKM6gnEPCFVb3W yqOkC+5SkIgh7o6YOXT156Ou19EoHmoTrHca4+trYo3R8Bawhz2GMLMWMIZm2qAryraj 3QcQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KtNE7R1cdzCgHkHKWaIDSRv/qlQEr1YAvY7nMPkuk3E=; b=AF31fZ/kcXohwSQg1/fQ7ty9n9RhU7rSDUOAJaAP9e1SZJ1Q7ThsQzJQP9DMYOuGJ0 qQbWUOeJ0zy0CTwdMWCRfSjj8bC3sCifyxTS6ZePOSrCJXIcyKl3thPkiBSHpgcMwaKP jVPDEGbzVAkZXa6PrdMUpjzmCGrwHaIW/YR4NO7D1bagq4QNBgKu6Enxj+heKSCt50Ag JHk0iY+i8Rdvs1uXt8mFxQm+aJvDhFbiThAOQkNz051lFy8VkX59qxA4utSPJR4uzkP5 BgW08lrwVW1WhgNX6WBoKY4XS4DAjcr5JqL27fF2U79p9DXCxL8uYdn9YtM7tc5zf89g eevw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXVoGk2PvwIhGHMTd+244keR6TNGKKXyY3Bg/gVYbxE08UNlr2r eksi/45iC124NaZzHhrDZtP7cfLuO6RhOHiz15M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqypvwI9StShfZl4pc+4p+Cq9CV0B0ehnFtCEhozz3HoJoBuLGpcbVviHu6TWXs2BmdXbej/SzC6UWmX39VWoAI= X-Received: by 2002:a19:4a:: with SMTP id 71mr16259055lfa.50.1582191437103; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:37:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <67aa82a8-3c8d-d1eb-7e83-4f722b1eeb2a@oracle.com> <20200219012736.20363-1-almasrymina@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Miguel Ojeda Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:37:06 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/hugetlb: Fix file_region entry allocations To: Mina Almasry Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux-MM , linux-kernel , Qian Cai , Mike Kravetz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.428057, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:28 AM Mina Almasry wrote: > > I figured it was related to that, but it's still annoying as > clang-format works perfectly for me aside from handling the > list_for_each_* macros. I tried digging into clang-format docs to find > the setting to add to the .clang-format but I couldn't find one. It > would be nice if someone fixed that. Yep, there are a handful of things clang-format does not do as we would like (yet). Nevertheless, it is always good to hear people is taking advantage of the config! :) Cheers, Miguel