From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] MM updates for 6.14-rc1
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 21:58:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANiq72=fj0MHiwy5i=FWZxfP_=XsFpjojywF91N6ygdumtQbwQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=whgufZwjAuL1PBs1gjSMK95TEhGj1SiMbNvkysWBcEPMw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 7:30 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> That seems to be a reasonable assumption. I guess some crazy setup
> *could* install a bindgen that uses a different llvm version than
> rustc itself, but that sounds pretty damn broken.
Tangential to the issue, but a note on this: we have a few warnings in
that `rust_is_available.sh` script for things that "do not look
great", such as bindgen's libclang != Clang when `CC` is Clang, and we
could have a warning for the case you mention, i.e. bindgen's libclang
!= rustc's LLVM.
However, currently some kernel developers use toolchains from upstream
Rust (e.g. from `rustup`) instead of their distributions, so that
could be annoying for them (since their bindgen may be picking
libclang from their distribution).
But eventually when things stabilize more it could make sense, if most
developers stop using those, as a by-default warning.
Cheers,
Miguel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-26 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-25 0:22 Andrew Morton
2025-01-25 22:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-01-26 5:00 ` Andrew Morton
2025-01-26 7:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-01-26 8:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-26 12:10 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-01-26 9:57 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-01-26 17:21 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-01-26 18:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-01-26 19:46 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-01-26 20:06 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-01-26 21:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-01-26 23:27 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-01-27 0:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-01-27 7:29 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-01-26 20:28 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-01-26 21:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-01-26 21:35 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-01-26 20:58 ` Miguel Ojeda [this message]
2025-01-29 20:10 ` John Hubbard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANiq72=fj0MHiwy5i=FWZxfP_=XsFpjojywF91N6ygdumtQbwQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox