linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] page count lock for simpler put_page
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:50:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANN689HrJPx233U3Z2oYRS9Gj3AQeFsyzkutGUFkOQCWrQ0NRw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110812153616.GH7959@redhat.com>

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 04:04:21AM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
>> - Use my proposed page count lock in order to avoid the race. One
>> would have to convert all get_page_unless_zero() sites to use it. I
>> expect the cost would be low but still measurable.
>
> I didn't yet focus at your problem after we talked about it at MM
> summit, but I seem to recall I suggested there to just get to the head
> page and always take the lock on it. split_huge_page only works at 2M
> aligned pages, the rest you don't care about. Getting to the head page
> compound_lock should be always safe. And that will still scale
> incredibly better than taking the lru_lock for the whole zone (which
> would also work). And it seems the best way to stop split_huge_page
> without having to alter the put_page fast path when it works on head
> pages (the only thing that gets into put_page complex slow path is the
> release of tail pages after get_user_pages* so it'd be nice if
> put_page fast path still didn't need to take locks).

We did talk about it. At some point I thought it might work :)

The problem case there is this. Say the page I want to
get_page_unless_zero is a single page, and the page at the prior 2M
aligned boundary is currently free. I can't rely on the desired page
not getting reallocated, because I don't have a reference on it yet.
But I can't make things safe by taking a reference and/or the compound
lock on the aligned page either, because its refcount currently is
zero.

-- 
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-12 22:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-04 21:07 Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-04 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm: Replace naked page->_count accesses with accessor functions Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-04 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm: page count lock Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-07 14:00   ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-04 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: get_first_page_unless_zero() Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-07 14:13   ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-05  6:39 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] page count lock for simpler put_page Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-07 14:25   ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-09 11:04     ` Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-09 22:22       ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-12 22:35         ` Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-13  4:07           ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-12 15:36       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-08-12 16:08         ` SPAM: " Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-12 16:43           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-08-12 17:27             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-12 23:45               ` Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-13  1:57                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-13 23:56                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-08-13  4:18             ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-12 16:57           ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-12 17:08             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-08-12 17:52               ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-12 18:13                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-12 19:05                   ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-12 22:14                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-12 22:22                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-08-12 18:03               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-12 17:41             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-12 17:56               ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-12 23:02           ` Michel Lespinasse
2011-08-12 22:50         ` Michel Lespinasse [this message]
2011-08-13  4:11         ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-12 16:58   ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANN689HrJPx233U3Z2oYRS9Gj3AQeFsyzkutGUFkOQCWrQ0NRw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=walken@google.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox