linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>, "Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: Downgrade mmap_sem before locking or populating on mmap
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 04:39:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANN689HG3tYAjijoeU0fMZW+sxGFyKFtzgycLMubT-rEPQhrRw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e91ea19fbd30fa17718cb293473ae207ee8fd0f.1355536006.git.luto@amacapital.net>

On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
> This is a serious cause of mmap_sem contention.  MAP_POPULATE
> and MCL_FUTURE, in particular, are disastrous in multithreaded programs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> ---
>
> Changes from v1:
>
> The non-unlocking versions of do_mmap_pgoff and mmap_region are still
> available for aio_setup_ring's benefit.  In theory, aio_setup_ring
> would do better with a lock-downgrading version, but that would be
> somewhat ugly and doesn't help my workload.

Hi Andy,

I agree that the long mmap_sem hold times when using MAP_POPULATE,
MAP_LOCKED or MCL_FUTURE are a problem. However, I'm not entirely
happy with your proposed solution.

My main concern is that just downgrading the mmap_sem only hides the
problem: as soon as a writer gets queued on that mmap_sem,
reader/writer fairness kicks in and blocks any new readers, which
makes the problem reappear. So in order to completely fix the issue,
we should look for a way that doesn't require holding the mmap_sem
(even in read mode) for the entire duration of the populate or mlock
operation.

I think this could be done by extending the mlock work I did as part
of v2.6.38-rc1. The commit message for
fed067da46ad3b9acedaf794a5f05d0bc153280b explains the idea; basically
mlock() was split into do_mlock() which just sets the VM_LOCKED flag
on vmas as needed, and do_mlock_pages() which goes through a range of
addresses and actually populates/mlocks each individual page that is
part of a VM_LOCKED vma.

This could be easily extended for mlocks that happen in mmap_region()
due to MAP_LOCKED or MCL_FUTURE: mmap_region() would just set the
VM_LOCKED flag and defer the work of actually populating/mlocking the
individual pages. I think the only constraint here is that the pages
must be locked before returning to userspace, so we may be able to use
the task_work mechanism to achieve that. Later on (but before
returning to userspace) we would notice we have some mlock work to do
and call do_mlock_pages() to achieve that.

I think the benefits of this approach would be:
- no mmap_sem locking changes around mmap_region() - which also means
that all code paths to mmap_region() can instantly benefit
- do_mlock_pages() doesn't need to hold a read lock on mmap_sem for
the entire duration of the operation, so we can fully solve the
problem instead of just making it harder to trigger

Now for handling MAP_POPULATE, we would probably want to use a similar
mechanism as well, so that we don't need to hold the mmap_sem for the
entire duration of the populate. This is similar in principle to the
MAP_LOCKED case; however this may require the introduction of a new
VM_POPULATE vma flag in order to avoid the possibility of a race where
someone replaces our vma with another before we get a chance to
populate it.

I don't have an implementation for this idea yet; however I'm hoping
to come up with one before xmas. Before then, any comments on the idea
?

-- 
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-12-16 12:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-14  5:49 [PATCH] " Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-14  7:27 ` Al Viro
2012-12-14 11:14   ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-14 14:49     ` Al Viro
2012-12-14 16:12       ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-16  8:41         ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-16 17:04         ` Al Viro
2012-12-16 17:48           ` Al Viro
2012-12-16 18:49           ` Johannes Weiner
2012-12-16 19:53           ` Al Viro
2012-12-16 20:16           ` Al Viro
2012-12-15  2:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-16  9:00   ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-16 17:52     ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-17  9:52       ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-18  0:54         ` [PATCH v3] " Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-20  2:22           ` Simon Jeons
2012-12-16 12:39   ` Michel Lespinasse [this message]
2012-12-16 18:05     ` [PATCH v2] " Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-17  3:29       ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-12-17 22:01         ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-16 19:58   ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANN689HG3tYAjijoeU0fMZW+sxGFyKFtzgycLMubT-rEPQhrRw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=walken@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=joern@logfs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox