From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>, "Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: Downgrade mmap_sem before locking or populating on mmap
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 19:29:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANN689GKp-9Bfn6HENeSXe=PZ0Qy5uOP6ju5gosMFKFDPC0D8w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrW58pb2w_r0gUDmMVSqi8PBQRdR1dRj2HX0ymq+qnz8XA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> wrote:
>> My main concern is that just downgrading the mmap_sem only hides the
>> problem: as soon as a writer gets queued on that mmap_sem,
>> reader/writer fairness kicks in and blocks any new readers, which
>> makes the problem reappear. So in order to completely fix the issue,
>> we should look for a way that doesn't require holding the mmap_sem
>> (even in read mode) for the entire duration of the populate or mlock
>> operation.
>
> Ugh.
>
> At least with my patch, mmap in MCL_FUTURE mode is no worse than mmap
> + mlock. I suspect I haven't hit this because all my mmaping is done
> by one thread, so it never ends up waiting for itself, and the other
> thread have very short mmap_sem hold times.
Yes, you won't hit the problems with long read-side mmap_sem hold
times if you don't have other threads blocking for the write side.
>> I think this could be done by extending the mlock work I did as part
>> of v2.6.38-rc1. The commit message for
>> c explains the idea; basically
>> mlock() was split into do_mlock() which just sets the VM_LOCKED flag
>> on vmas as needed, and do_mlock_pages() which goes through a range of
>> addresses and actually populates/mlocks each individual page that is
>> part of a VM_LOCKED vma.
>
> Doesn't this have the same problem? It holds mmap_sem for read for a
> long time, and if another writer comes in then r/w starvation
> prevention will kick in.
Well, my point is that do_mlock_pages() doesn't need to hold the
mmap_sem read side for a long time. It currently releases it when
faulting a page requires a disk read, and could conceptually release
it more often if needed.
We can't easily release mmap_sem from within mmap_region() since
mmap_region's callers don't expect it; however we can defer the page
mlocking and we don't have to hold mmap_sem continuously until then.
The only constraints are the new VM_LOCKED region's pages must be
mlocked before we return to userspace, and that if a concurrent thread
modifies the mappings while we don't hold mmap_sem, and creates a new
non-mlocked region, we shouldn't mlock those pages in
do_mlock_pages().
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-17 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-14 5:49 [PATCH] " Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-14 7:27 ` Al Viro
2012-12-14 11:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-14 14:49 ` Al Viro
2012-12-14 16:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-16 8:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-16 17:04 ` Al Viro
2012-12-16 17:48 ` Al Viro
2012-12-16 18:49 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-12-16 19:53 ` Al Viro
2012-12-16 20:16 ` Al Viro
2012-12-15 2:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-16 9:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-16 17:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-17 9:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-18 0:54 ` [PATCH v3] " Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-20 2:22 ` Simon Jeons
2012-12-16 12:39 ` [PATCH v2] " Michel Lespinasse
2012-12-16 18:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-17 3:29 ` Michel Lespinasse [this message]
2012-12-17 22:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-16 19:58 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANN689GKp-9Bfn6HENeSXe=PZ0Qy5uOP6ju5gosMFKFDPC0D8w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=walken@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=joern@logfs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox