From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com (mail-ig0-f178.google.com [209.85.213.178]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CB482F7F for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:08:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by igbkq10 with SMTP id kq10so54764075igb.0 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:08:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ig0-x22b.google.com (mail-ig0-x22b.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22b]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id kj8si13398253igb.28.2015.10.19.05.08.49 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:08:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by igbhv6 with SMTP id hv6so55283174igb.0 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:08:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151015095328.GA7001@bgram> References: <1444900142-1996-1-git-send-email-zhuhui@xiaomi.com> <1444900142-1996-2-git-send-email-zhuhui@xiaomi.com> <561F7173.3000900@suse.cz> <20151015095328.GA7001@bgram> From: Hui Zhu Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:08:09 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/3] migrate: new struct migration and add it to struct page Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Minchan Kim Cc: Vlastimil Babka , Hui Zhu , Nitin Gupta , Sergey Senozhatsky , Andrew Morton , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Mel Gorman , Dave Hansen , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Konstantin Khlebnikov , Andrea Arcangeli , Alexander Duyck , Tejun Heo , Joonsoo Kim , Naoya Horiguchi , Jennifer Herbert , Hugh Dickins , Vladimir Davydov , David Rientjes , Sasha Levin , "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Wanpeng Li , Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Thelen , Al Viro , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Memory Management List On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:27:15AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> On 10/15/2015 11:09 AM, Hui Zhu wrote: >> >I got that add function interfaces is really not a good idea. >> >So I add a new struct migration to put all migration interfaces and add >> >this struct to struct page as union of "mapping". >> >> That's better, but not as flexible as the previously proposed >> approaches that Sergey pointed you at: >> >> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1507.0/03233.html >> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1508.1/00696.html >> >> There the operations are reachable via mapping, so we can support >> the special operations migration also when mapping is otherwise >> needed; your patch excludes mapping. >> > > Hello Hui, > > FYI, I take over the work from Gioh and have a plan to improve the work. > So, Could you wait a bit? Of course, if you have better idea, feel free > to post it. > > Thanks. Hi Minchan and Vlastimil, If you don't mind. I want to wait the patches and focus on page movable of zsmalloc part. What do you think about it? Best, Hui -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org