From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE426C4360F for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:37:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EA720693 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:37:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 86EA720693 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 208796B000D; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:37:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 1B9846B000E; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:37:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 0A9466B0010; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:37:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com [209.85.217.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51C36B000D for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:37:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 2so826595vsf.15 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 06:37:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-original-authentication-results:x-gm-message-state:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XzQ9NHyI634XKb+UUobZCMcWq8m8E9RK1f4ELxnBy2E=; b=T9zNTAU7eg7gOxUxVeP0pKzzpp/dXNU2gVBj9u2TKnWmI1yRbyYoY5ewKGq0G755jd x46pqUctdo72pim3YaNsfFNhTGHyzR3dTV1SvjITf3gDTP80uAoozdgaUXfSM9X8ofSR P7X6RbwZ3A9gah2LnFrYoze14DViWDViVX3UdDgbUFEx4bCxQjm8/16CYrPHG7xcXi6I zM5W9NKRxq+anWHqBK4tdc8S9GoF1QM6MPMBz43PyY23zZeqnKT67nmmW1wDfvAgHy0I Ge7EHyCOESJNt5X9Hr403KtJYvdBDVxzc2ZWSkmO3mD45x+KS/ll3dvyGN8Tog2u3tJW AX5g== X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of geert.uytterhoeven@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.65 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=geert.uytterhoeven@gmail.com X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUNRkpwIvfdYEcgBRbfpYiHBs/kCFnxvHEeZNoGlCY/+1uPFaT/ FYaQj7NLgySlQ3sVeMlAhNE55TvwTTRtlhACCaHXokEeP2JrJcFtEZtiSPRQ2DfNPw/XsJOh5un nR/MSodQ2xl8X+C4rl5a5HcWYj7nH2EKCC471sIVghrbJc8p1PCJXaJmqvScssrM= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:300a:: with SMTP id f10mr5515818ual.32.1553261851468; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 06:37:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:ab0:300a:: with SMTP id f10mr5515789ual.32.1553261850839; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 06:37:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1553261850; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZoE1xScU9Ga3NAgqKPMhZZR2w6HXAZSZDEI7XvPbW/gA5EoGkLBUlk2jgg5aE9Tb2z DT/FKkHgQ89o1KVj8iAOdGNbEVs3gM2DobTt1UPBUDTNH9N/KAS7JvZ99fXEJQuBy0ZE FTezp92Tx5meHa/HJ1Z+QOmlMJKx8BxYVgV6/VXRn69yFo4pck+Mtw6s+O+RwdLoAC3A mtOsGBNZCmOjHzfCFCYy3gGqAGFpnMsqgXRUCGd4VZWeJWg8GedkTuQamX8ZhDgYtB8J 4b0eC2Uf9xiAWhkVQ/TpwM3Szz4xm52Zalb1EcpM0ctRvks0vnoZWwvsscMpJEV9VJ3X zjIg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version; bh=XzQ9NHyI634XKb+UUobZCMcWq8m8E9RK1f4ELxnBy2E=; b=RwgTaR6KEP+BzfUHni+aIPB+1ga4kMG6SQ3rG+5OqDmV+fD2YGdjLAauWYpIIzXoMF vtWIwe7HyNssbHepCfFDtNqA1lkjy38PWK36QF7Wt8jyrnzSfjgPeRKIQzSHLs3IB9w7 tU09GZyARDvlPoRLNhN445S23EAQeK1YvrT7oSSuDptgXYYsWRC7UcQLB4NWK/8yNB/C 2hUCt8x91HEyITUxLRXdiSqkwLoZ7COdJrJS+f1vqru2D29ykttRlMWr/L2XuikMuZjA 23XF3quulneVNOT6uMwTovSo8W04ccdLXiRkXzZQn8PWbDjd/iDpCD16R5dZI2QTN1RU G6aA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of geert.uytterhoeven@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.65 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=geert.uytterhoeven@gmail.com Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id k16sor5694041uao.8.2019.03.22.06.37.30 for (Google Transport Security); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 06:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of geert.uytterhoeven@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.65 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.65; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of geert.uytterhoeven@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.65 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=geert.uytterhoeven@gmail.com X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy4ogpwjpSonoiPfh2lc9ghBw42usNLeIrbxmtszFsz2NZOsJfJk0zpTsb127+lhrr709ywFNgm7FrLQ8o0S0U= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6419:: with SMTP id x25mr938049uao.86.1553261850477; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 06:37:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190322132108.25501-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20190322132108.25501-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:37:18 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove support for deprecated %pf and %pF in vsprintf To: Sakari Ailus Cc: Petr Mladek , Linux Kernel Mailing List , scsi , Linux PM list , Linux MMC List , "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, ACPI Devel Maling List , netdev , linux-btrfs , linux-pci , sparclinux , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, ceph-devel , Andy Shevchenko , Linux MM , Linux ARM , Lars Ellenberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Sakari, On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:25 PM Sakari Ailus wrote: > The printk family of functions supports %ps and %pS conversion specifiers > to print function names. Yet the deprecated %pf and %pF conversion > specifiers with equivalent functionality remain supported. A number of > users of %pf and %pF remain. > > This patchsets converts the existing users of %pf and %pF to %ps and %pS, > respectively, and removes support for the deprecated %pf and %pF. > > The patches apply cleanly both on 5.1-rc1 as well as on Linux-next. No new > %pf or %pF users have been added in the meantime so the patch is > sufficient as itself on linux-next, too. Do you know in which commit they became deprecated, so the backporters know how far this can be backported safely? Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds