Please disregard this patch -- I just noticed the same fix is already
  in linux-next as commit c12c3e150780 ("memblock: reserve_mem: fix end
  caclulation in reserve_mem_release_by_name()") by Mike Rapoport.

  Sorry for the noise.

  Thanks,
  DaeMyung

2026년 4월 14일 (화) 오후 8:13, Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>님이 작성:
Hi

On 4/14/26 4:13 PM, DaeMyung Kang wrote:
> free_reserved_area() treats its 'end' argument as exclusive: it aligns
> end down via 'end & PAGE_MASK' and iterates with 'pos < end'.
>
> reserve_mem_release_by_name() instead passes 'start + map->size - 1',
> which causes the last page of a page-aligned reservation to never be
> freed. For a reservation spanning N pages, only N - 1 pages are
> released back to the allocator.
>
> Fix it by passing the exclusive end address, 'start + map->size'.
>
> Fixes: 74e2498ccf7b ("mm/memblock: Add reserved memory release function")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: DaeMyung Kang <charsyam@gmail.com>


I think it might be better to send v2 as a separate patch  rather than
as a reply to the previous version.

This patch looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Donet Tom donettom@linux.ibm.com

-Donet


> ---
> Changes in v2:
>   - Add Fixes: tag and Cc: stable (per Donet Tom's review).
>   - v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
>
>   mm/memblock.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index b3ddfdec7a80..d4a02f1750e9 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -2434,7 +2434,7 @@ int reserve_mem_release_by_name(const char *name)
>               return 0;
>   
>       start = phys_to_virt(map->start);
> -     end = start + map->size - 1;
> +     end = start + map->size;
>       snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "reserve_mem:%s", name);
>       free_reserved_area(start, end, 0, buf);
>       map->size = 0;