From: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
Marc Gauthier <Marc.Gauthier@tensilica.com>,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: Re: TLB and PTE coherency during munmap
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 05:40:29 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMo8BfLO21hORMPoYofyibVeioAw=vzXjjD9EPnjdn2Duvb+WQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130529122728.GA27176@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:10:25AM +0400, Max Filippov wrote:
>> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello arch and mm people.
>> >
>> > Is it intentional that threads of a process that invoked munmap syscall
>> > can see TLB entries pointing to already freed pages, or it is a bug?
>> >
>> > I'm talking about zap_pmd_range and zap_pte_range:
>> >
>> > zap_pmd_range
>> > zap_pte_range
>> > arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode
>> > ptep_get_and_clear_full
>> > tlb_remove_tlb_entry
>> > __tlb_remove_page
>> > arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode
>> > cond_resched
>> >
>> > With the default arch_{enter,leave}_lazy_mmu_mode, tlb_remove_tlb_entry
>> > and __tlb_remove_page there is a loop in the zap_pte_range that clears
>> > PTEs and frees corresponding pages, but doesn't flush TLB, and
>> > surrounding loop in the zap_pmd_range that calls cond_resched. If a thread
>> > of the same process gets scheduled then it is able to see TLB entries
>> > pointing to already freed physical pages.
>> >
>> > I've noticed that with xtensa arch when I added a test before returning to
>> > userspace checking that TLB contents agrees with page tables of the
>> > current mm. This check reliably fires with the LTP test mtest05 that
>> > maps, unmaps and accesses memory from multiple threads.
>> >
>> > Is there anything wrong in my description, maybe something specific to
>> > my arch, or this issue really exists?
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've made similar checking function for MIPS (because qemu is my only choice
>> and it simulates MIPS TLB) and ran my tests on mips-malta machine in qemu.
>> With MIPS I can also see this issue. I hope I did it right, the patch at the
>> bottom is for the reference. The test I run and the diagnostic output are as
>> follows:
>>
>> To me it looks like the cond_resched in the zap_pmd_range is the root cause
>> of this issue (let alone SMP case for now). It was introduced in the commit
>>
>> commit 97a894136f29802da19a15541de3c019e1ca147e
>> Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
>> Date: Tue May 24 17:12:04 2011 -0700
>>
>> mm: Remove i_mmap_lock lockbreak
>>
>> Peter, Kamezawa, other reviewers of that commit, could you please comment?
>
> Are you all running UP systems? I suppose the preemptible muck
Yes, xtensa SMP support is in the middle of forward porting/cleanup process.
> invalidated the assumption that UP systems are 'easy'.
>
> If you make tlb_fast_mode() return an unconditional false, does it all
> work again?
Actually the only thing that was visibly broken is the test for
TLB/PTE coherency,
but that incoherency appears to be intentional (and the test is too
simple for that).
Unconditionally returning false from tlb_fast_mode() doesn't fix that test, but
AFAICS it fixes underlying page freeing.
--
Thanks.
-- Max
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-31 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAMo8BfL4QfJrfejNKmBDhAVdmE=_Ys6MVUH5Xa3w_mU41hwx0A@mail.gmail.com>
2013-05-26 2:50 ` Max Filippov
2013-05-28 7:10 ` Max Filippov
2013-05-29 12:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-29 12:42 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-05-29 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-29 17:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-29 22:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-30 6:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-30 5:04 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-05-30 6:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-30 7:00 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-05-30 11:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-31 4:09 ` Max Filippov
2013-05-31 7:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-03 9:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-03 9:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-03 10:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-06-03 10:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-03 10:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-06-04 9:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-05 0:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-06-05 10:26 ` [PATCH] arch, mm: Remove tlb_fast_mode() Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-31 1:40 ` Max Filippov [this message]
2013-05-28 14:34 ` TLB and PTE coherency during munmap Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-29 3:23 ` Max Filippov
2013-05-28 15:16 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-28 15:23 ` Catalin Marinas
[not found] ` <CAHkRjk4ZNwZvf_Cv+HqfMManodCkEpCPdZokPQ68z3nVG8-+wg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-05-29 4:15 ` Max Filippov
2013-05-29 10:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-31 1:26 ` Max Filippov
2013-05-31 9:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-06-03 9:16 ` Max Filippov
2013-05-29 12:00 ` Vineet Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMo8BfLO21hORMPoYofyibVeioAw=vzXjjD9EPnjdn2Duvb+WQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=Marc.Gauthier@tensilica.com \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox