linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	andrey.konovalov@linux.dev,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	 Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	 Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
	 Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] kasan: switch kunit tests to console tracepoints
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 15:02:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMn1gO6heXaovFy6jvpWS8TFLBhTomqNuxJmt_chrd5sYtskvw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMn1gO4_+-0x4ibpcASy4bLeZ+7rsmjx=0AYKGVDUApUbanSrQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:45 PM Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:33 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 09:57:40 +0100
> > Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, you are right, and it's something I've wondered how to do better
> > > as well. Let's try to consult tracing maintainers on what the right
> > > approach is.
> >
> > I have to go and revisit the config options for CONFIG_FTRACE and
> > CONFIG_TRACING, as they were added when this all started (back in
> > 2008), and the naming was rather all misnomers back then.
> >
> > "ftrace" is really for just the function tracing, but CONFIG_FTRACE
> > really should just be for the function tracing infrastructure, and
> > perhaps not even include trace events :-/ But at the time it was
> > created, it was for all the "tracers" (this was added before trace
> > events).
>
> It would be great to see this cleaned up. I found this aspect of how
> tracing works rather confusing.
>
> So do you think it makes sense for the KASAN tests to "select TRACING"
> for now if the code depends on the trace event infrastructure?

Any thoughts? It looks like someone else got tripped up by this:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D144057

Peter


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-02 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-18 17:17 andrey.konovalov
2022-10-18 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] kasan: migrate kasan_rcu_uaf test to kunit andrey.konovalov
2022-10-18 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] kasan: migrate workqueue_uaf " andrey.konovalov
2023-02-14  1:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] kasan: switch kunit tests to console tracepoints Peter Collingbourne
2023-02-14  6:07   ` Marco Elver
2023-02-15  2:55     ` Peter Collingbourne
2023-02-15  8:57       ` Marco Elver
2023-02-15 19:33         ` Steven Rostedt
2023-02-24  6:45           ` Peter Collingbourne
2023-05-01 22:02             ` Peter Collingbourne [this message]
2023-05-01 22:30               ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-05-05 13:58               ` Steven Rostedt
2023-12-11 16:37                 ` Paul Heidekrüger
2023-12-11 17:50                   ` Andrey Konovalov
2023-12-11 18:59                     ` Paul Heidekrüger
2023-12-11 20:51                       ` Andrey Konovalov
2023-12-11 22:47                         ` Paul Heidekrüger
2023-12-11 22:56                           ` Marco Elver
2023-12-11 23:35                             ` Paul Heidekrüger
2023-12-11 23:37                               ` Andrey Konovalov
2023-12-12  9:19                                 ` Paul Heidekrüger
2023-12-12  9:32                                   ` Marco Elver
2024-01-07 18:22                                     ` Paul Heidekrüger
2024-02-05 11:34                                       ` Paul Heidekrüger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMn1gO6heXaovFy6jvpWS8TFLBhTomqNuxJmt_chrd5sYtskvw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=pcc@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrey.konovalov@linux.dev \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox