From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
To: Keith Packard <keithpac@amazon.com>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Abbott Liu" <liuwenliang@huawei.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Andrey Ryabinin" <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
"Anshuman Khandual" <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Bjorn Andersson" <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
"Christoph Lameter" <cl@linux.com>,
"Dennis Zhou" <dennis@kernel.org>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>, "Joe Perches" <joe@perches.com>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Linux Memory Management List" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
"Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
"Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@gooogle.com>,
"Nicolas Pitre" <nico@fluxnic.net>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Valentin Schneider" <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
"Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"Wolfram Sang (Renesas)" <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
"YiFei Zhu" <yifeifz2@illinois.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] ARM: Stop using TPIDRPRW to hold per_cpu_offset
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 15:54:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXG-cWAVn7MinFFEOiG2F-bdQ+TqgSuV0rfXz75Vh2Y7SQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210907220038.91021-6-keithpac@amazon.com>
On Wed, 8 Sept 2021 at 00:00, Keith Packard <keithpac@amazon.com> wrote:
>
> We're going to store TPIDRPRW here instead
>
?
> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithpac@amazon.com>
I'd much prefer to keep using TPIDIRPRW for the per-CPU offsets, and
use the user space TLS register for current.
There are several reasons for this:
- arm64 does the same - as someone who still cares about ARM while
many have moved on to arm64 or RISC-V, I am still trying to maintain
parity between ARM and arm64 where possible.
- efficiency: loading the per-CPU offset using a CPU id stored in
memory, which is then used to index the per-CPU offsets array in
memory adds two additional loads to every load/store of a per-CPU
variable
- 'current' usually does not change value under the code's feet,
whereas per-CPU offsets might change at any time. Given the fact that
the CPU offset load is visible to the compiler as a memory access, I
suppose this should be safe, but I would still prefer per-CPU access
to avoid going via current if possible.
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h | 31 -------------------------------
> arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 7 -------
> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 3 ---
> 3 files changed, 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h
> index e2fcb3cfd3de..eeafcd6a3e01 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h
> @@ -7,37 +7,6 @@
>
> register unsigned long current_stack_pointer asm ("sp");
>
> -/*
> - * Same as asm-generic/percpu.h, except that we store the per cpu offset
> - * in the TPIDRPRW. TPIDRPRW only exists on V6K and V7
> - */
> -#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && !defined(CONFIG_CPU_V6)
> -static inline void set_my_cpu_offset(unsigned long off)
> -{
> - /* Set TPIDRPRW */
> - asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c13, c0, 4" : : "r" (off) : "memory");
> -}
> -
> -static inline unsigned long __my_cpu_offset(void)
> -{
> - unsigned long off;
> -
> - /*
> - * Read TPIDRPRW.
> - * We want to allow caching the value, so avoid using volatile and
> - * instead use a fake stack read to hazard against barrier().
> - */
> - asm("mrc p15, 0, %0, c13, c0, 4" : "=r" (off)
> - : "Q" (*(const unsigned long *)current_stack_pointer));
> -
> - return off;
> -}
> -#define __my_cpu_offset __my_cpu_offset()
> -#else
> -#define set_my_cpu_offset(x) do {} while(0)
> -
> -#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> -
> #include <asm-generic/percpu.h>
>
> #endif /* _ASM_ARM_PERCPU_H_ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> index ca0201635fac..d0dc60afe54f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -590,13 +590,6 @@ void __init smp_setup_processor_id(void)
> for (i = 1; i < nr_cpu_ids; ++i)
> cpu_logical_map(i) = i == cpu ? 0 : i;
>
> - /*
> - * clear __my_cpu_offset on boot CPU to avoid hang caused by
> - * using percpu variable early, for example, lockdep will
> - * access percpu variable inside lock_release
> - */
> - set_my_cpu_offset(0);
> -
> pr_info("Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x%x\n", mpidr);
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> index 5e999f1f1aea..8ccf10b34f08 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -410,8 +410,6 @@ asmlinkage void secondary_start_kernel(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *tas
> {
> struct mm_struct *mm = &init_mm;
>
> - set_my_cpu_offset(per_cpu_offset(cpu));
> -
> secondary_biglittle_init();
>
> /*
> @@ -495,7 +493,6 @@ void __init smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
>
> void __init smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
> {
> - set_my_cpu_offset(per_cpu_offset(smp_processor_id()));
> }
>
> void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
> --
> 2.33.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-09 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210904060908.1310204-1-keithp@keithp.com>
2021-09-07 22:00 ` [PATCH 0/7] ARM: support THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK (v3) Keith Packard
2021-09-07 22:00 ` [PATCH 1/7] ARM: Pass cpu number to secondary_start_kernel Keith Packard
2021-09-07 22:00 ` [PATCH 2/7] ARM: Pass task " Keith Packard
2021-09-07 22:00 ` [PATCH 3/7] ARM: Use smp_processor_id() in vfp_pm_suspend instead of ti->cpu Keith Packard
2021-09-07 22:00 ` [PATCH 4/7] ARM: Use hack from powerpc to get current cpu number Keith Packard
2021-09-08 7:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-09-07 22:00 ` [PATCH 5/7] ARM: Stop using TPIDRPRW to hold per_cpu_offset Keith Packard
2021-09-09 13:54 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2021-09-07 22:00 ` [PATCH 6/7] ARM: Use TPIDRPRW for current Keith Packard
2021-09-09 13:56 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-09-07 22:00 ` [PATCH 7/7] ARM: Move thread_info into task_struct (v7 only) Keith Packard
2021-09-08 7:01 ` [PATCH 0/7] ARM: support THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK (v3) Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-08 7:47 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-09-08 7:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMj1kXG-cWAVn7MinFFEOiG2F-bdQ+TqgSuV0rfXz75Vh2Y7SQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=keithpac@amazon.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=liuwenliang@huawei.com \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@gooogle.com \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=yifeifz2@illinois.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox