From: Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com>
To: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/swapfile.c: introduce function alloc_swap_scan_list()
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2025 03:51:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMgjq7DnniGUdpQQA0YF+LuMuL9+FCLQJP2Q04G_Hsd1sztv9A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250808-swap-scan-list-v2-1-d50e4758ecee@kernel.org>
On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 3:48 PM Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> This the alloc_swap_scan_list() will scan the whole list or the first
> cluster.
Hi Chris,
This sentence reads strange to me, but English is not my native
language so I'm not very sure about it.
>
> This reduces the repeat patterns of isolating a cluster then scanning
> that cluster. As a result, cluster_alloc_swap_entry() is shorter and shallower.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
> ---
> This patch goes on top of Kairui's swap improve cluster scan series:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250806161748.76651-1-ryncsn@gmail.com/
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Adjust change base on Andrew's feedback on int type and break out of
> loop.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250806-swap-scan-list-v1-1-a5fe2d9340a2@kernel.org
> ---
> mm/swapfile.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> index 4a0cf4fb348d..f26678d68874 100644
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -820,6 +820,29 @@ static unsigned int alloc_swap_scan_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> return found;
> }
>
> +static unsigned int alloc_swap_scan_list(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> + struct list_head *list,
> + unsigned int order,
> + unsigned char usage,
> + bool scan_all)
> +{
> + unsigned int found = SWAP_ENTRY_INVALID;
> +
> + do {
> + struct swap_cluster_info *ci = isolate_lock_cluster(si, list);
> + unsigned long offset;
> +
> + if (!ci)
> + break;
> + offset = cluster_offset(si, ci);
> + found = alloc_swap_scan_cluster(si, ci, offset, order, usage);
> + if (found)
> + break;
> + } while (scan_all);
> +
> + return found;
> +}
> +
> static void swap_reclaim_full_clusters(struct swap_info_struct *si, bool force)
> {
> long to_scan = 1;
> @@ -913,32 +936,24 @@ static unsigned long cluster_alloc_swap_entry(struct swap_info_struct *si, int o
> * to spread out the writes.
> */
> if (si->flags & SWP_PAGE_DISCARD) {
> - ci = isolate_lock_cluster(si, &si->free_clusters);
> - if (ci) {
> - found = alloc_swap_scan_cluster(si, ci, cluster_offset(si, ci),
> - order, usage);
> - if (found)
> - goto done;
> - }
> + found = alloc_swap_scan_list(si, &si->free_clusters, order, usage,
> + false);
> + if (found)
> + goto done;
> }
>
> if (order < PMD_ORDER) {
> - while ((ci = isolate_lock_cluster(si, &si->nonfull_clusters[order]))) {
> - found = alloc_swap_scan_cluster(si, ci, cluster_offset(si, ci),
> - order, usage);
> - if (found)
> - goto done;
> - }
> + found = alloc_swap_scan_list(si, &si->nonfull_clusters[order],
> + order, usage, 0);
All other alloc_swap_scan_list calls use `false`/`true` but this one
uses `0` for `scan_all`.
And it should be `true`, right?
> + if (found)
> + goto done;
> }
>
> if (!(si->flags & SWP_PAGE_DISCARD)) {
> - ci = isolate_lock_cluster(si, &si->free_clusters);
> - if (ci) {
> - found = alloc_swap_scan_cluster(si, ci, cluster_offset(si, ci),
> - order, usage);
> - if (found)
> - goto done;
> - }
> + found = alloc_swap_scan_list(si, &si->free_clusters, order, usage,
> + false);
> + if (found)
> + goto done;
> }
>
> /* Try reclaim full clusters if free and nonfull lists are drained */
> @@ -952,13 +967,10 @@ static unsigned long cluster_alloc_swap_entry(struct swap_info_struct *si, int o
> * failure is not critical. Scanning one cluster still
> * keeps the list rotated and reclaimed (for HAS_CACHE).
> */
> - ci = isolate_lock_cluster(si, &si->frag_clusters[order]);
> - if (ci) {
> - found = alloc_swap_scan_cluster(si, ci, cluster_offset(si, ci),
> - order, usage);
> - if (found)
> - goto done;
> - }
> + found = alloc_swap_scan_list(si, &si->frag_clusters[order], order,
> + usage, true);
And it should be `false` here.
> + if (found)
> + goto done;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -977,19 +989,15 @@ static unsigned long cluster_alloc_swap_entry(struct swap_info_struct *si, int o
> * Clusters here have at least one usable slots and can't fail order 0
> * allocation, but reclaim may drop si->lock and race with another user.
> */
> - while ((ci = isolate_lock_cluster(si, &si->frag_clusters[o]))) {
> - found = alloc_swap_scan_cluster(si, ci, cluster_offset(si, ci),
> - 0, usage);
> - if (found)
> - goto done;
> - }
> + found = alloc_swap_scan_list(si, &si->frag_clusters[o],
> + 0, usage, true);
> + if (found)
> + goto done;
>
> - while ((ci = isolate_lock_cluster(si, &si->nonfull_clusters[o]))) {
> - found = alloc_swap_scan_cluster(si, ci, cluster_offset(si, ci),
> - 0, usage);
> - if (found)
> - goto done;
> - }
> + found = alloc_swap_scan_list(si, &si->nonfull_clusters[o],
> + 0, usage, true);
> + if (found)
> + goto done;
> }
> done:
> if (!(si->flags & SWP_SOLIDSTATE))
>
> ---
> base-commit: f89484324d5876ee10765fa61da0332899fa1a6a
> change-id: 20250806-swap-scan-list-2b89e3424b0a
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
>
This makes the code much cleaner, thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-08 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-08 7:48 Chris Li
2025-08-08 19:51 ` Kairui Song [this message]
2025-08-12 4:24 ` Andrew Morton
2025-08-12 4:47 ` Chris Li
2025-08-12 5:58 ` Chris Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMgjq7DnniGUdpQQA0YF+LuMuL9+FCLQJP2Q04G_Hsd1sztv9A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ryncsn@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox