linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	 Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
	 Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,  Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/shmem, swap: avoid redundant Xarray lookup during swapin
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 15:22:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMgjq7BmJ1fqWsDgkbiCt++_uA1D0kxfDOdKVjtHCS9Y4jfKWg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c9503955-36a0-48eb-aa4c-73a85b2da2ca@arm.com>

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 3:17 PM Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 18/06/25 12:05 am, Kairui Song wrote:
> > From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> >
> > Currently shmem calls xa_get_order to get the swap radix entry order,
> > requiring a full tree walk. This can be easily combined with the swap
> > entry value checking (shmem_confirm_swap) to avoid the duplicated
> > lookup, which should improve the performance.
>
> Nice spot!
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> > ---
> >   mm/shmem.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> > index 4e7ef343a29b..0ad49e57f736 100644
> > --- a/mm/shmem.c
> > +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> > @@ -505,15 +505,27 @@ static int shmem_replace_entry(struct address_space *mapping,
> >
> >   /*
> >    * Sometimes, before we decide whether to proceed or to fail, we must check
> > - * that an entry was not already brought back from swap by a racing thread.
> > + * that an entry was not already brought back or split by a racing thread.
> >    *
> >    * Checking folio is not enough: by the time a swapcache folio is locked, it
> >    * might be reused, and again be swapcache, using the same swap as before.
> > + * Returns the swap entry's order if it still presents, else returns -1.
> >    */
> > -static bool shmem_confirm_swap(struct address_space *mapping,
> > -                            pgoff_t index, swp_entry_t swap)
> > +static int shmem_swap_check_entry(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index,
> > +                               swp_entry_t swap)
>
> I think the function name shmem_confirm_swap is already good enough? Anyhow the
> changed name should at least be shmem_check_entry_is_swap.
>

Good, I can keep the function name unchanged or follow your
suggestion, I thought a `confirm` function returning non-binary return
value may look strange. I'm terrible at naming things :P


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-18  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-17 18:34 [PATCH 0/4] mm/shmem, swap: bugfix and improvement of mTHP swap in Kairui Song
2025-06-17 18:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/shmem, swap: improve cached mTHP handling and fix potential hung Kairui Song
2025-06-17 22:58   ` Andrew Morton
2025-06-18  2:11     ` Kairui Song
2025-06-18  2:08   ` Kemeng Shi
2025-06-17 18:35 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/shmem, swap: avoid redundant Xarray lookup during swapin Kairui Song
2025-06-18  2:48   ` Kemeng Shi
2025-06-18  3:07     ` Kairui Song
2025-06-19  1:30       ` Kemeng Shi
2025-06-18  7:16   ` Dev Jain
2025-06-18  7:22     ` Kairui Song [this message]
2025-06-18  7:29       ` Dev Jain
2025-06-17 18:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/shmem, swap: improve mthp swapin process Kairui Song
2025-06-18  6:27   ` Kemeng Shi
2025-06-18  6:50     ` Kairui Song
2025-06-18  8:08       ` Kemeng Shi
2025-06-18  8:26   ` Kemeng Shi
2025-06-18  8:46     ` Kairui Song
2025-06-19  1:32       ` Kemeng Shi
2025-06-17 18:35 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/shmem, swap: avoid false positive swap cache lookup Kairui Song
2025-06-19  1:28   ` Kemeng Shi
2025-06-19 17:37     ` Kairui Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMgjq7BmJ1fqWsDgkbiCt++_uA1D0kxfDOdKVjtHCS9Y4jfKWg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ryncsn@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox