linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] mm: swap: remove unneeded VM_BUG_ON(*map != SWAP_HAS_CACHE) in swap_entry_range_free()
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 13:18:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMgjq7BR5afYGvKqLXdp7kHB-n+JRxgcsmX-rn+Y9YKY1ZXtTA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250318150614.6415-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>

On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 2:10 PM Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> wrote:
>
> As all callers of swap_entry_range_free() have already ensured slots to
> be freed are marked as SWAP_HAS_CACHE while holding the cluster lock,
> the BUG_ON check can be safely removed. After this, the function
> swap_entry_range_free() could drop any kind of last flag, rename it to
> swap_entries_free() and update it's comment accordingly.
>
> This is a preparation to use swap_entries_free() to drop last ref count
> and SWAP_MAP_SHMEM flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  mm/swapfile.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> index 5a775456e26c..0aa7ce82c013 100644
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -52,9 +52,9 @@
>  static bool swap_count_continued(struct swap_info_struct *, pgoff_t,
>                                  unsigned char);
>  static void free_swap_count_continuations(struct swap_info_struct *);
> -static void swap_entry_range_free(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> -                                 struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
> -                                 swp_entry_t entry, unsigned int nr_pages);
> +static void swap_entries_free(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> +                             struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
> +                             swp_entry_t entry, unsigned int nr_pages);
>  static void swap_range_alloc(struct swap_info_struct *si,
>                              unsigned int nr_entries);
>  static bool folio_swapcache_freeable(struct folio *folio);
> @@ -1463,7 +1463,7 @@ static unsigned char swap_entry_put(struct swap_info_struct *si,
>         ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
>         usage = swap_entry_put_locked(si, offset, 1);
>         if (!usage)
> -               swap_entry_range_free(si, ci, swp_entry(si->type, offset), 1);
> +               swap_entries_free(si, ci, swp_entry(si->type, offset), 1);
>         unlock_cluster(ci);
>
>         return usage;
> @@ -1493,7 +1493,7 @@ static bool swap_entries_put_nr(struct swap_info_struct *si,
>         for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
>                 WRITE_ONCE(si->swap_map[offset + i], SWAP_HAS_CACHE);
>         if (!has_cache)
> -               swap_entry_range_free(si, ci, entry, nr);
> +               swap_entries_free(si, ci, entry, nr);
>         unlock_cluster(ci);
>
>         return has_cache;
> @@ -1512,12 +1512,12 @@ static bool swap_entries_put_nr(struct swap_info_struct *si,
>  }
>
>  /*
> - * Drop the last HAS_CACHE flag of swap entries, caller have to
> - * ensure all entries belong to the same cgroup.
> + * Drop the last flag(1, SWAP_HAS_CACHE or SWAP_MAP_SHMEM) of swap entries,
> + * caller have to ensure all entries belong to the same cgroup and cluster.
>   */
> -static void swap_entry_range_free(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> -                                 struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
> -                                 swp_entry_t entry, unsigned int nr_pages)
> +static void swap_entries_free(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> +                             struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
> +                             swp_entry_t entry, unsigned int nr_pages)
>  {
>         unsigned long offset = swp_offset(entry);
>         unsigned char *map = si->swap_map + offset;
> @@ -1530,7 +1530,6 @@ static void swap_entry_range_free(struct swap_info_struct *si,
>
>         ci->count -= nr_pages;
>         do {
> -               VM_BUG_ON(*map != SWAP_HAS_CACHE);

Hi Kemeng

Instead of just dropping this check, maybe it's better to change it to
something like VM_BUG_ON(!*map); to catch potential SWAP double free?
I've found this check very helpful for debugging, especially for
catching concurrency problems.

Or more strictly: VM_BUG_ON(*map !=  SWAP_HAS_CACHE && *map != 1 &&
*map != SWAP_MAP_SHMEM);, you may introduce a helper to check if a
entry is the "last map" like this and use it somewhere else too.


>                 *map = 0;
>         } while (++map < map_end);
>
> @@ -1553,7 +1552,7 @@ static void cluster_swap_free_nr(struct swap_info_struct *si,
>         ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
>         do {
>                 if (!swap_entry_put_locked(si, offset, usage))
> -                       swap_entry_range_free(si, ci, swp_entry(si->type, offset), 1);
> +                       swap_entries_free(si, ci, swp_entry(si->type, offset), 1);
>         } while (++offset < end);
>         unlock_cluster(ci);
>  }
> @@ -1596,11 +1595,11 @@ void put_swap_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry)
>
>         ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
>         if (swap_only_has_cache(si, offset, size))
> -               swap_entry_range_free(si, ci, entry, size);
> +               swap_entries_free(si, ci, entry, size);
>         else {
>                 for (int i = 0; i < size; i++, entry.val++) {
>                         if (!swap_entry_put_locked(si, offset + i, SWAP_HAS_CACHE))
> -                               swap_entry_range_free(si, ci, entry, 1);
> +                               swap_entries_free(si, ci, entry, 1);
>                 }
>         }
>         unlock_cluster(ci);
> --
> 2.30.0
>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-19  5:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-18 15:06 [PATCH v2 0/8] Minor cleanups and improvements to swap freeing code Kemeng Shi
2025-03-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] mm: swap: rename __swap_[entry/entries]_free[_locked] to swap_[entry/entries]_put[_locked] Kemeng Shi
2025-03-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] mm: swap: remove unneeded VM_BUG_ON(*map != SWAP_HAS_CACHE) in swap_entry_range_free() Kemeng Shi
2025-03-19  5:18   ` Kairui Song [this message]
2025-03-20  1:10     ` Kemeng Shi
2025-03-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] mm: swap: use swap_entries_free() to free swap entry in swap_entry_put_locked() Kemeng Shi
2025-03-18 18:08   ` Kairui Song
2025-03-20  1:05     ` Kemeng Shi
2025-03-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] mm: swap: use swap_entries_free() drop last ref count in swap_entries_put_nr() Kemeng Shi
2025-03-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] mm: swap: drop last SWAP_MAP_SHMEM flag in batch " Kemeng Shi
2025-03-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] mm: swap: free each cluster individually in swap_entries_put_map_nr() Kemeng Shi
2025-03-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] mm: swap: factor out helper to drop cache of entries within a single cluster Kemeng Shi
2025-03-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] mm: swap: replace cluster_swap_free_nr() with swap_entries_put_[map/cache]() Kemeng Shi
2025-03-18 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] Minor cleanups and improvements to swap freeing code Tim Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMgjq7BR5afYGvKqLXdp7kHB-n+JRxgcsmX-rn+Y9YKY1ZXtTA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ryncsn@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox