From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx200.postini.com [74.125.245.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 551FE6B0075 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 01:42:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so16922844pbb.14 for ; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 22:42:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1341545097-9933-1-git-send-email-shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1341545097-9933-1-git-send-email-shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 13:42:39 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/buddy: more comments for skip_free_areas_node() From: Cong Wang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Gavin Shan Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Gavin Shan wrote: > The initial idea comes from Cong Wang. We're running out of memory > while calling function skip_free_areas_node(). So it would be unsafe > to allocate more memory from either stack or heap. The patche adds > more comments to address that. I think these comments should add to show_free_areas(), not skip_free_areas_node(). -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org