linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	 Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	 David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	 Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	 Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
	 "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,  Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
	 Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	 Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] mm/cma: change cma mutex to irq safe spinlock
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:08:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMZfGtUv4O_+W5rHt0P4Xbw=WXJ-ZwHYMrg=iJa2CEkfxb91gA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YGLayMqYOrMMQ841@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:01 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon 29-03-21 16:23:55, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > Ideally, cma_release could be called from any context.  However, that is
> > not possible because a mutex is used to protect the per-area bitmap.
> > Change the bitmap to an irq safe spinlock.
>
> I would phrase the changelog slightly differerent
> "
> cma_release is currently a sleepable operatation because the bitmap
> manipulation is protected by cma->lock mutex. Hugetlb code which relies
> on cma_release for CMA backed (giga) hugetlb pages, however, needs to be
> irq safe.
>
> The lock doesn't protect any sleepable operation so it can be changed to
> a (irq aware) spin lock. The bitmap processing should be quite fast in
> typical case but if cma sizes grow to TB then we will likely need to
> replace the lock by a more optimized bitmap implementation.
> "
>
> it seems that you are overusing irqsave variants even from context which
> are never called from the IRQ context so they do not need storing flags.
>
> [...]
> > @@ -391,8 +391,9 @@ static void cma_debug_show_areas(struct cma *cma)
> >       unsigned long start = 0;
> >       unsigned long nr_part, nr_total = 0;
> >       unsigned long nbits = cma_bitmap_maxno(cma);
> > +     unsigned long flags;
> >
> > -     mutex_lock(&cma->lock);
> > +     spin_lock_irqsave(&cma->lock, flags);
>
> spin_lock_irq should be sufficient. This is only called from the
> allocation context and that is never called from IRQ context.

This makes me think more. I think that spin_lock should be
sufficient. Right?


>
> >       pr_info("number of available pages: ");
> >       for (;;) {
> >               next_zero_bit = find_next_zero_bit(cma->bitmap, nbits, start);
> > @@ -407,7 +408,7 @@ static void cma_debug_show_areas(struct cma *cma)
> >               start = next_zero_bit + nr_zero;
> >       }
> >       pr_cont("=> %lu free of %lu total pages\n", nr_total, cma->count);
> > -     mutex_unlock(&cma->lock);
> > +     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cma->lock, flags);
> >  }
> >  #else
> >  static inline void cma_debug_show_areas(struct cma *cma) { }
> > @@ -430,6 +431,7 @@ struct page *cma_alloc(struct cma *cma, size_t count, unsigned int align,
> >       unsigned long pfn = -1;
> >       unsigned long start = 0;
> >       unsigned long bitmap_maxno, bitmap_no, bitmap_count;
> > +     unsigned long flags;
> >       size_t i;
> >       struct page *page = NULL;
> >       int ret = -ENOMEM;
> > @@ -454,12 +456,12 @@ struct page *cma_alloc(struct cma *cma, size_t count, unsigned int align,
> >               goto out;
> >
> >       for (;;) {
> > -             mutex_lock(&cma->lock);
> > +             spin_lock_irqsave(&cma->lock, flags);
> >               bitmap_no = bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(cma->bitmap,
> >                               bitmap_maxno, start, bitmap_count, mask,
> >                               offset);
> >               if (bitmap_no >= bitmap_maxno) {
> > -                     mutex_unlock(&cma->lock);
> > +                     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cma->lock, flags);
> >                       break;
> >               }
> >               bitmap_set(cma->bitmap, bitmap_no, bitmap_count);
>
> same here.
>
> > @@ -468,7 +470,7 @@ struct page *cma_alloc(struct cma *cma, size_t count, unsigned int align,
> >                * our exclusive use. If the migration fails we will take the
> >                * lock again and unmark it.
> >                */
> > -             mutex_unlock(&cma->lock);
> > +             spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cma->lock, flags);
> >
> >               pfn = cma->base_pfn + (bitmap_no << cma->order_per_bit);
> >               ret = alloc_contig_range(pfn, pfn + count, MIGRATE_CMA,
> > diff --git a/mm/cma.h b/mm/cma.h
> > index 68ffad4e430d..2c775877eae2 100644
> > --- a/mm/cma.h
> > +++ b/mm/cma.h
> > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ struct cma {
> >       unsigned long   count;
> >       unsigned long   *bitmap;
> >       unsigned int order_per_bit; /* Order of pages represented by one bit */
> > -     struct mutex    lock;
> > +     spinlock_t      lock;
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_CMA_DEBUGFS
> >       struct hlist_head mem_head;
> >       spinlock_t mem_head_lock;
> > diff --git a/mm/cma_debug.c b/mm/cma_debug.c
> > index d5bf8aa34fdc..6379cfbfd568 100644
> > --- a/mm/cma_debug.c
> > +++ b/mm/cma_debug.c
> > @@ -35,11 +35,12 @@ static int cma_used_get(void *data, u64 *val)
> >  {
> >       struct cma *cma = data;
> >       unsigned long used;
> > +     unsigned long flags;
> >
> > -     mutex_lock(&cma->lock);
> > +     spin_lock_irqsave(&cma->lock, flags);
> >       /* pages counter is smaller than sizeof(int) */
> >       used = bitmap_weight(cma->bitmap, (int)cma_bitmap_maxno(cma));
> > -     mutex_unlock(&cma->lock);
> > +     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cma->lock, flags);
> >       *val = (u64)used << cma->order_per_bit;
>
> same here
>
> >
> >       return 0;
> > @@ -52,8 +53,9 @@ static int cma_maxchunk_get(void *data, u64 *val)
> >       unsigned long maxchunk = 0;
> >       unsigned long start, end = 0;
> >       unsigned long bitmap_maxno = cma_bitmap_maxno(cma);
> > +     unsigned long flags;
> >
> > -     mutex_lock(&cma->lock);
> > +     spin_lock_irqsave(&cma->lock, flags);
> >       for (;;) {
> >               start = find_next_zero_bit(cma->bitmap, bitmap_maxno, end);
> >               if (start >= bitmap_maxno)
> > @@ -61,7 +63,7 @@ static int cma_maxchunk_get(void *data, u64 *val)
> >               end = find_next_bit(cma->bitmap, bitmap_maxno, start);
> >               maxchunk = max(end - start, maxchunk);
> >       }
> > -     mutex_unlock(&cma->lock);
> > +     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cma->lock, flags);
> >       *val = (u64)maxchunk << cma->order_per_bit;
> >
> >       return 0;
>
> and here.
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-30  8:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-29 23:23 [PATCH v2 0/8] make hugetlb put_page safe for all calling contexts Mike Kravetz
2021-03-29 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] mm/cma: change cma mutex to irq safe spinlock Mike Kravetz
2021-03-30  1:13   ` Roman Gushchin
2021-03-30  1:20   ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-03-30  2:18     ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-30  8:01   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-30  8:08     ` Muchun Song [this message]
2021-03-30  8:17       ` [External] " Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-03-30  8:18       ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-30  8:21         ` Muchun Song
2021-03-31  2:37     ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-29 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] hugetlb: no need to drop hugetlb_lock to call cma_release Mike Kravetz
2021-03-30  1:13   ` Roman Gushchin
2021-03-30  8:01   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-29 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] hugetlb: add per-hstate mutex to synchronize user adjustments Mike Kravetz
2021-03-30  2:23   ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-03-29 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] hugetlb: create remove_hugetlb_page() to separate functionality Mike Kravetz
2021-03-29 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] hugetlb: call update_and_free_page without hugetlb_lock Mike Kravetz
2021-03-30  2:10   ` Miaohe Lin
2021-03-30  2:21   ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-03-31  2:39     ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-29 23:24 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] hugetlb: change free_pool_huge_page to remove_pool_huge_page Mike Kravetz
2021-03-30  2:30   ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-03-30  8:06   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-29 23:24 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] hugetlb: make free_huge_page irq safe Mike Kravetz
2021-03-29 23:24 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] hugetlb: add lockdep_assert_held() calls for hugetlb_lock Mike Kravetz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMZfGtUv4O_+W5rHt0P4Xbw=WXJ-ZwHYMrg=iJa2CEkfxb91gA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=almasrymina@google.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox