From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: memcontrol: bail out early when id is zero
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 19:34:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMZfGtUD3H6e+s_n+2q9aE3ABKJaooRj_vyELBaTTVUssSK-NA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YCpMo6gLFyqANsgd@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 6:27 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon 15-02-21 18:09:44, Muchun Song wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 5:39 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat 13-02-21 01:01:58, Muchun Song wrote:
> > > > The memcg ID cannot be zero, but we can pass zero to mem_cgroup_from_id,
> > > > so idr_find() is pointless and wastes CPU cycles.
> > >
> > > Is this possible at all to happen? If not why should we add a test for
> > > _all_ invocations?
> >
> > Yeah, this indeed can happen. If we allocate a new swap cache page
> > and charge it via mem_cgroup_charge, then the page will uncharge
> > the swap counter via mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap. When the swap
> > entry is indeed freed, we will call mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap again,
> > In this routine, we can pass zero to mem_cgroup_from_id. Right?
>
> If the above claim is correct, which I would need to double check then
> it should have been part of the changelog! Please think of your poor
> reviewers and the time they have to invest into the review.
The easy way may be adding a printk to mem_cgroup_from_id when
the parameter is zero.
>
> I would also like to see your waste of CPU cycles argument to be backed
> by something. Are we talking about cycles due to an additional function
Yeah, when the parameter is already zero, idr_find() must return zero.
So I think that the additional function call is unnecessary. I have added
a printk to mem_cgroup_from_id, I found the parameter can be zero
several times.
> call? Is this really something we should even care about?
Maybe not. Just my thoughts.
Thanks.
>
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > mm/memcontrol.c | 3 +++
> > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > > > index a3f26522765a..68ed4b297c13 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > > > @@ -5173,6 +5173,9 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_id_put(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> > > > struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_id(unsigned short id)
> > > > {
> > > > WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
> > > > + /* The memcg ID cannot be zero. */
> > > > + if (id == 0)
> > > > + return NULL;
> > > > return idr_find(&mem_cgroup_idr, id);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.11.0
> > >
> > > --
> > > Michal Hocko
> > > SUSE Labs
>
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-15 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-12 17:01 [PATCH 1/4] mm: memcontrol: remove memcg check from memcg_oom_recover Muchun Song
2021-02-12 17:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: memcontrol: add missing memcg_oom_recover() when uncharge slab page Muchun Song
2021-02-15 9:37 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-12 17:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: memcontrol: bail out early when id is zero Muchun Song
2021-02-15 9:39 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-15 10:09 ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-02-15 10:27 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-15 11:34 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2021-02-12 17:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: memcontrol: fix swap uncharge on cgroup v2 Muchun Song
2021-02-12 18:56 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-02-13 6:48 ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-02-16 17:16 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-02-15 9:47 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-15 10:15 ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-02-15 10:24 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-16 16:59 ` Johannes Weiner
2021-02-16 17:17 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-02-16 17:19 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-16 17:28 ` Johannes Weiner
2021-02-17 5:15 ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-02-17 5:11 ` Muchun Song
2021-02-15 9:24 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: memcontrol: remove memcg check from memcg_oom_recover Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMZfGtUD3H6e+s_n+2q9aE3ABKJaooRj_vyELBaTTVUssSK-NA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox