From: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>
To: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] z3fold: discourage use of pages that weren't compacted
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 15:14:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMJBoFPZDeatN9N2Wc0MtKHAHwJwYtbFtTsLtcuJUp4=Rj0GNQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALZtONChB1HA7rSAhJA9FuOznRa7sXJYqRach+=Y7Pu8RzpJfQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If a z3fold page couldn't be compacted, we don't want it to be
>> used for next object allocation in the first place.
>
> why? !compacted can only mean 1) already compact or 2) middle chunks
> is mapped. #1 is as good compaction-wise as the page can get, so do
> you mean that if a page couldn't be compacted because of #2, we
> shouldn't use it for next allocation? if so, that isn't quite what
> this patch does.
>
>> It makes more
>> sense to add it to the end of the relevant unbuddied list. If that
>> page gets compacted later, it will be added to the beginning of
>> the list then.
>>
>> This simple idea gives 5-7% improvement in randrw fio tests and
>> about 10% improvement in fio sequential read/write.
>
> i don't understand why there is any improvement - the unbuddied lists
> are grouped by the amount of free chunks, so all pages in a specific
> unbuddied list should have exactly that number of free chunks
> available, and it shouldn't matter if a page gets put into the front
> or back...where is the performance improvement coming from?
When the next attempt to compact this page comes, it's less likely
it's locked so the wait times are slightly lower in average.
~vitaly
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> mm/z3fold.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/z3fold.c b/mm/z3fold.c
>> index ffd9353..e282ba0 100644
>> --- a/mm/z3fold.c
>> +++ b/mm/z3fold.c
>> @@ -539,11 +539,19 @@ static void z3fold_free(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
>> free_z3fold_page(zhdr);
>> atomic64_dec(&pool->pages_nr);
>> } else {
>> - z3fold_compact_page(zhdr);
>> + int compacted = z3fold_compact_page(zhdr);
>> /* Add to the unbuddied list */
>> spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>> freechunks = num_free_chunks(zhdr);
>> - list_add(&zhdr->buddy, &pool->unbuddied[freechunks]);
>> + /*
>> + * If the page has been compacted, we want to use it
>> + * in the first place.
>> + */
>> + if (compacted)
>> + list_add(&zhdr->buddy, &pool->unbuddied[freechunks]);
>> + else
>> + list_add_tail(&zhdr->buddy,
>> + &pool->unbuddied[freechunks]);
>> spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> z3fold_page_unlock(zhdr);
>> }
>> @@ -672,12 +680,16 @@ static int z3fold_reclaim_page(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned int retries)
>> spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>> list_add(&zhdr->buddy, &pool->buddied);
>> } else {
>> - z3fold_compact_page(zhdr);
>> + int compacted = z3fold_compact_page(zhdr);
>> /* add to unbuddied list */
>> spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>> freechunks = num_free_chunks(zhdr);
>> - list_add(&zhdr->buddy,
>> - &pool->unbuddied[freechunks]);
>> + if (compacted)
>> + list_add(&zhdr->buddy,
>> + &pool->unbuddied[freechunks]);
>> + else
>> + list_add_tail(&zhdr->buddy,
>> + &pool->unbuddied[freechunks]);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.4.2
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-28 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-15 15:55 [PATCH 0/3] z3fold: per-page spinlock and other smaller optimizations Vitaly Wool
2016-11-15 16:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] z3fold: use per-page spinlock Vitaly Wool
2016-11-25 16:28 ` Dan Streetman
2016-11-15 16:00 ` [PATCH 2/3] z3fold: don't fail kernel build if z3fold_header is too big Vitaly Wool
2016-11-25 15:59 ` Dan Streetman
2016-11-25 16:25 ` Vitaly Wool
2016-11-25 18:33 ` Dan Streetman
2016-11-26 9:12 ` Vitaly Wool
2016-11-15 16:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] z3fold: discourage use of pages that weren't compacted Vitaly Wool
2016-11-25 18:25 ` Dan Streetman
2016-11-28 14:14 ` Vitaly Wool [this message]
2016-11-29 22:27 ` Dan Streetman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMJBoFPZDeatN9N2Wc0MtKHAHwJwYtbFtTsLtcuJUp4=Rj0GNQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=vitalywool@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ddstreet@ieee.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox