On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 12:13:54PM +0530, pratyush.brahma@oss.qualcomm.com wrote:
> From: Pratyush Brahma <pratyush.brahma@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
> Replace the direct usage of printk(KERN_DEBUG ...) with pr_debug(...) to
> align with the consistent `pr_*` API usage within the file.
>
> Reviewed-by: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Brahma <pratyush.brahma@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Removed printk header as suggested by Joshua.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250808-numa-dbg-v1-1-2ddd1ec634aa@oss.qualcomm.com
> ---
> mm/numa_memblks.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/numa_memblks.c b/mm/numa_memblks.c
> index 541a99c4071a67e5b0ef66f4136dee268a880003..ed6fcfca057ab4c9a8aa26cd1929551b4ded4a5b 100644
> --- a/mm/numa_memblks.c
> +++ b/mm/numa_memblks.c
> @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
>
> #include <linux/array_size.h>
> #include <linux/sort.h>
> -#include <linux/printk.h>
Please don't, pr_debug is defined there.
But I had compile tested this code. I wonder why it didn't throw any error.
> #include <linux/memblock.h>
> #include <linux/numa.h>
> #include <linux/numa_memblks.h>
> @@ -76,7 +75,7 @@ static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void)
> for (j = 0; j < cnt; j++)
> numa_distance[i * cnt + j] = i == j ?
> LOCAL_DISTANCE : REMOTE_DISTANCE;
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "NUMA: Initialized distance table, cnt=%d\n", cnt);
> + pr_debug("NUMA: Initialized distance table, cnt=%d\n", cnt);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> ---
> base-commit: 479058002c32b77acac43e883b92174e22c4be2d
> change-id: 20250808-numa-dbg-62a8b2092c56
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Pratyush Brahma <pratyush.brahma@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.