From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f69.google.com (mail-wm0-f69.google.com [74.125.82.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24716B026D for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 11:46:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f69.google.com with SMTP id v17-v6so2147124wmc.0 for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 08:46:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id p4-v6sor807186wrd.31.2018.07.03.08.46.41 for (Google Transport Security); Tue, 03 Jul 2018 08:46:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <153063036670.1818.16010062622751502.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <153063054586.1818.6041047871606697364.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20180703152723.GB21590@bombadil.infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20180703152723.GB21590@bombadil.infradead.org> From: Shakeel Butt Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 08:46:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/17] mm: Assign id to every memcg-aware shrinker Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Kirill Tkhai , Vladimir Davydov , Alexander Viro , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Thomas Gleixner , Philippe Ombredanne , stummala@codeaurora.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Stephen Rothwell , Roman Gushchin , mka@chromium.org, Tetsuo Handa , Chris Wilson , longman@redhat.com, Minchan Kim , Huang Ying , Mel Gorman , jbacik@fb.com, Guenter Roeck , LKML , Linux MM , lirongqing@baidu.com, Andrey Ryabinin , Andrew Morton On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 8:27 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:09:05PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote: > > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > > @@ -169,6 +169,49 @@ unsigned long vm_total_pages; > > static LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list); > > static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem); > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM > > +static DEFINE_IDR(shrinker_idr); > > +static int shrinker_nr_max; > > So ... we've now got a list_head (shrinker_list) which contains all of > the shrinkers, plus a shrinker_idr which contains the memcg-aware shrinkers? > > Why not replace the shrinker_list with the shrinker_idr? It's only used > twice in vmscan.c: > > void register_shrinker_prepared(struct shrinker *shrinker) > { > down_write(&shrinker_rwsem); > list_add_tail(&shrinker->list, &shrinker_list); > up_write(&shrinker_rwsem); > } > > list_for_each_entry(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) { > ... > > The first is simply idr_alloc() and the second is > > idr_for_each_entry(&shrinker_idr, shrinker, id) { > > I understand there's a difference between allocating the shrinker's ID and > adding it to the list. You can do this by calling idr_alloc with NULL > as the pointer, and then using idr_replace() when you want to add the > shrinker to the list. idr_for_each_entry() skips over NULL entries. > > This will actually reduce the size of each shrinker and be more > cache-efficient when calling the shrinkers. I think we can also get > rid of the shrinker_rwsem eventually, but let's leave it for now. Can you explain how you envision shrinker_rwsem can be removed? I am very much interested in doing that. thanks, Shakeel