From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398F6C433E0 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 19:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FC423AAC for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 19:57:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B2FC423AAC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C421C8D01A7; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 14:57:44 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id BCB298D0156; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 14:57:44 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id A95018D01A7; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 14:57:44 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0100.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.100]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8888D0156 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 14:57:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin22.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C781DFA for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 19:57:44 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77683668048.22.rat54_470f6d0274f5 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin22.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22CD218038E68 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 19:57:44 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: rat54_470f6d0274f5 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3098 Received: from mail-lf1-f52.google.com (mail-lf1-f52.google.com [209.85.167.52]) by imf44.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 19:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf1-f52.google.com with SMTP id l11so25845170lfg.0 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:57:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3W7x7ScL3wGkQjE5SI95SfSty4cvjot0cOD9t89S6rY=; b=fARfI0CqTUFPbYt68DPCIOj5rZiF3wO2g9YE5Y/tBYsz7TSsvjphEWxH4YEF9Xas9p nmt5oJkBMdqklVTS3xKbVNzbAsRcSPvOdEWxEK+mXRLjJq/UsAtB58yF6vNpaiCFm7Qk 36N46uLWQiLyRQbtiMNCEenU/xzuC0HEJomK8GS0n4j2gRUGrnOgYdq63HxYL6NtJEmL 0fc5y9cjApbT/z9qMH7ftRfldtYns+xvG/odA1X9ciZhNX2ag21QXapD7xx/P+QkR+PB zFWzC0n6vAn4dpElr2eo/+HLknFRl2/tjE9K7XTz226+qALCM/oLrUwZO17NaC1GGVFZ lTpA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3W7x7ScL3wGkQjE5SI95SfSty4cvjot0cOD9t89S6rY=; b=kWlcMJ0hcjqhNG9IoUEdfEfDfeWEbI5FgQ9hk/RgaVb/w5xp54QsMyI4sWEYJxeKBX VIDEj/nZWH+iWryFWvWjqJJK83BFSHLCUWN4SCVT6WZhEOMR0/rZYYRESMBB508IHHix ifP5cs1s8K83yC1fR9k/UNuQ5n/0XP46ogugkHoc/UcHUhuY20SQpOpevqoJTaCBjceB noZSlnoQyIUix1XanFWW6bZ4yPzdtf1FTZtBVsn8u8PHbqOejDd3FauefEe/HNK2oZNl qLyogcbCkzzpU6zUD7+r4ZsQVpiovvL0oK/WPsA9AWba6HiQxpxscZC9T/EHx/k8unb/ 7Nbw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5313sF8onvhM5uxM0cUAYwu834oLAuzxtnmLg3hTBH7IwtJDWCRj SPxRVkUFzHy+Zhmz5g6yAZP6CdM+wAw8TQLLA7hltUPWRto= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJziKZKezR5FFJtgceAonF2x6ApDI28G/BcG69DKiTmfX2Y4lj8WrmMbiUPJkHpMNw/gjbgnFIC/MQMYCo1tMW4= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9a84:: with SMTP id p4mr2031455lji.160.1610135862104; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:57:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210108020332.4096911-1-guro@fb.com> In-Reply-To: <20210108020332.4096911-1-guro@fb.com> From: Shakeel Butt Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:57:31 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: kmem: make __memcg_kmem_(un)charge static To: Roman Gushchin Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux MM , Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , LKML , Kernel Team Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 6:03 PM Roman Gushchin wrote: > > I've noticed that __memcg_kmem_charge() and __memcg_kmem_uncharge() > are not used anywhere except memcontrol.c. Yet they are not declared > as non-static and are declared in memcontrol.h. > > This patch makes them static. > > Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt