From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: bmerry@ska.ac.za
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: reduce memcg tree traversals for stats collection
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 07:27:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALvZod7Fqj_pJ2sn+XiDsoDX4jBLM22iGUrB9PeJXg+8S5xExQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOm-9arFu63A9YJ6yVtm6_LdtbRKZg1Q3dz8WugdkBBQfoOWYw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 4:26 AM Bruce Merry <bmerry@ska.ac.za> wrote:
>
> On 25 July 2018 at 00:46, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> wrote:
> > I ran a simple benchmark which reads the root_mem_cgroup's stat file
> > 1000 times in the presense of 2500 memcgs on cgroup-v1. The results are:
> >
> > Without the patch:
> > $ time ./read-root-stat-1000-times
> >
> > real 0m1.663s
> > user 0m0.000s
> > sys 0m1.660s
> >
> > With the patch:
> > $ time ./read-root-stat-1000-times
> >
> > real 0m0.468s
> > user 0m0.000s
> > sys 0m0.467s
>
> Thanks for cc'ing me. I've tried this patch using my test case and the
> results are interesting. With the patch applied, running my script
> only generates about 8000 new cgroups, compared to 40,000 before -
> presumably because the optimisation has altered the timing.
>
> On the other hand, if I run the script 5 times to generate 40000
> zombie cgroups, the time to get stats for the root cgroup (cgroup-v1)
> is almost unchanged at around 18ms (was 20ms, but there were slightly
> more cgroups as well), compared to the almost 4x speedup you're seeing
> in your test.
>
Hi Bruce, I think your script is trying to create zombies, so, the
experiments after that script will be non-deterministic. Why not just
create 40k cgroups ,no need for zombies, and the see how much this
patch affects reading stats.
Shakeel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-25 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-24 22:46 Shakeel Butt
2018-07-25 11:26 ` Bruce Merry
2018-07-25 14:27 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2018-07-26 13:56 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALvZod7Fqj_pJ2sn+XiDsoDX4jBLM22iGUrB9PeJXg+8S5xExQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bmerry@ska.ac.za \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox