From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2569C43334 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 14:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 53EB38D0002; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:17:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4ED818D0001; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:17:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 3B4AC8D0002; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:17:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0013.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.13]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB068D0001 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:17:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin13.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay11.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6F380A7E for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 14:17:47 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79551643374.13.34D5E31 Received: from mail-pg1-f172.google.com (mail-pg1-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by imf10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFE4C0056 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 14:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg1-f172.google.com with SMTP id d129so15974907pgc.9 for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 07:17:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=t/VzqBhdeUXo95CXdw+sR1832XLdMMWGD7inzgCcv0s=; b=GKr+vkThukwqmaNvPG/0RymW9w7HeD4W2WQYqSyw7WZ9mq0OyoiTiFlWGeRmSh4uvN Nu5ge2+ZaXbbNPmAVjPz+whFB996x2TzHZOgAM65lcU6IXQSxkqP9slO9jEh3J8LDPn+ Uqj8wQYf6Uf7Ge7z9NR34KLUdMni90t5WatC+/vC5IW7lso4lDwpY6eGaerYPbudaDyp Jk7yH5JdBUC3drda3unSWzBq3p1aDFABg5CfBrnN+HSsvb9X5yVi0hkWFbVWMMnaIIIH Hd1BsSvflIaXvj/c4Cpm6uMx7uQ4/cXUyxgPbNoP5IvePdxX5QxgANAY1b/gDuDZq50t 5Xgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=t/VzqBhdeUXo95CXdw+sR1832XLdMMWGD7inzgCcv0s=; b=eN9e93BGtYkNkH1YCAoxhPEF67I+PnIkwOshUyMLu+YqaCN3Emjk0rbf/2/EE/XGvi 2WlKo/xgaxQWyW7eby0ifmWO+GYdQEhB064vtuiZkqtdI0RQxulRJlxTHzcFhq5xBIia UR6fNURHGgGMfAhGVf/1/pVRi2O5Be49jG1AQEJGZ92D2OK5H2L9nNKQ7zrZu8Uzy8AL 1PFmwBjhp31btOaIZrIxpp5paiplZTQoeaDHsZg6JVHMKgTcD9C/df9GKi7FKtAinRiJ HMA1hxPeDrOOpam8gAiQf6zB+vtasw9mPjDfx4BAbPCFMvWBt/MIlKhFTpeT40afCaQy B1Vg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53176qYVDaW0w0+Vtn8GnTdYuzHDy0R+aIOnaVpyDw3VJiXQ7ei5 pmjvjQ7jbpN57uxFGAXAidh2GuUQGSIpz70cvLKdBg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxTJDzCwgwIx9uHIl8108+FIOYFr9+PP7OIa8hLdHtZwB1HiWZ/hLr2dmRHlepeLCIgFTW+Q9OvtM07w9sVYqk= X-Received: by 2002:a65:61a8:0:b0:3fa:95b8:66c4 with SMTP id i8-20020a6561a8000000b003fa95b866c4mr25479460pgv.166.1654611465611; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 07:17:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220607162504.7fd5a92a@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: From: Shakeel Butt Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 07:17:34 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [next] arm64: boot failed - next-20220606 To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux-Next Mailing List , open list , regressions@lists.linux.dev, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Linux ARM , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Ard Biesheuvel , Arnd Bergmann , Catalin Marinas , Raghuram Thammiraju , Mark Brown , Will Deacon , Roman Gushchin , Vasily Averin , Qian Cai Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0EFE4C0056 X-Stat-Signature: 81q3ou7yzjpqjq1j5zs5rr63w8ijduht X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf10.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=GKr+vkTh; spf=pass (imf10.hostedemail.com: domain of shakeelb@google.com designates 209.85.215.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=shakeelb@google.com; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=google.com X-HE-Tag: 1654611416-496142 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 3:28 AM Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > Hi Shakeel, > > > > > Can you test v5.19-rc1, please? If that does not fail, then you could > > > > bisect between that and next-20220606 ... > > > > > > > > > > This is already reported at > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yp4F6n2Ie32re7Ed@qian/ and I think we know > > > the underlying issue (which is calling virt_to_page() on a vmalloc > > > address). > > > > Sorry, I might be wrong. Just checked the stacktrace again and it > > seems like the failure is happening in early boot in this report. > > Though the error "Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual > > address" is happening in the function mem_cgroup_from_obj(). > > > > Naresh, can you repro the issue if you revert the patch "net: set > > proper memcg for net_init hooks allocations"? > > yes. You are right ! > 19ee3818b7c6 ("net: set proper memcg for net_init hooks allocations") > After reverting this single commit I am able to boot arm64 successfully. > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing > Can you please run script/faddr2line on "mem_cgroup_from_obj+0x2c/0x120"?