From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: memcontrol: don't account swap failures not due to cgroup limits
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 10:27:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALvZod6m-XOb6LvjAD0wXv1doP_LJb1yUJ-QRpJt3H+G=xyQXg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230202155626.1829121-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 7:56 AM Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
>
> Christian reports the following situation in a cgroup that doesn't
> have memory.swap.max configured:
>
> $ cat memory.swap.events
> high 0
> max 0
> fail 6218
>
> Upon closer examination, this is an ARM64 machine that doesn't support
> swapping out THPs. In that case, the first get_swap_page() fails, and
> the kernel falls back to splitting the THP and swapping the 4k
> constituents one by one. /proc/vmstat confirms this with a high rate
> of thp_swpout_fallback events.
>
> While the behavior can ultimately be explained, it's unexpected and
> confusing. I see three choices how to address this:
>
> a) Specifically exlude THP fallbacks from being counted, as the
> failure is transient and the memory is ultimately swapped.
>
> Arguably, though, the user would like to know if their cgroup's
> swap limit is causing high rates of THP splitting during swapout.
>
> b) Only count cgroup swap events when they are actually due to a
> cgroup's own limit. Exclude failures that are due to physical swap
> shortage or other system-level conditions (like !THP_SWAP). Also
> count them at the level where the limit is configured, which may be
> above the local cgroup that holds the page-to-be-swapped.
>
> This is in line with how memory.swap.high, memory.high and
> memory.max events are counted.
>
> However, it's a change in documented behavior.
>
> c) Leave it as is. The documentation says system-level events are
> counted, so stick to that.
>
> This is the conservative option, but isn't very user friendly.
> Cgroup events are usually due to a local control choice made by the
> user. Mixing in events that are beyond the user's control makes it
> difficult to id root causes and configure the system properly.
>
> Implement option b).
I prefer option b too.
>
> Reported-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
I think we should CC stable as well for early exposure.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-02 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-02 15:56 Johannes Weiner
2023-02-02 18:27 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2023-02-02 18:30 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-02-06 16:18 ` Michal Koutný
2023-02-07 16:54 ` Johannes Weiner
2023-02-07 19:09 ` Johannes Weiner
2023-02-07 19:21 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-02-07 22:14 ` Roman Gushchin
2023-02-03 19:00 ` Roman Gushchin
2023-02-03 19:07 ` Yang Shi
2023-02-03 19:19 ` Roman Gushchin
2023-02-07 16:52 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALvZod6m-XOb6LvjAD0wXv1doP_LJb1yUJ-QRpJt3H+G=xyQXg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox