linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	 Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
	 Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,  Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm v3] memcg: enable memory accounting in __alloc_pages_bulk
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 09:41:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALvZod6K6UXxDrkHp=mVDV7O-fAtmRkgMDngPazBhcyDUNxy_Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YWXS09ZBhZSy6FQQ@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:24 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue 12-10-21 09:08:38, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 8:36 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue 12-10-21 17:58:21, Vasily Averin wrote:
> > > > Enable memory accounting for bulk page allocator.
> > >
> > > ENOCHANGELOG
> > >
> > > And I have to say I am not very happy about the solution. It adds a very
> > > tricky code where it splits different charging steps apart.
> > >
> > > Would it be just too inefficient to charge page-by-page once all pages
> > > are already taken away from the pcp lists? This bulk should be small so
> > > this shouldn't really cause massive problems. I mean something like
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > index b37435c274cf..8bcd69195ef5 100644
> > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > @@ -5308,6 +5308,10 @@ unsigned long __alloc_pages_bulk(gfp_t gfp, int preferred_nid,
> > >
> > >         local_unlock_irqrestore(&pagesets.lock, flags);
> > >
> > > +       if (memcg_kmem_enabled() && (gfp & __GFP_ACCOUNT)) {
> > > +               /* charge pages here */
> > > +       }
> >
> > It is not that simple because __alloc_pages_bulk only allocate pages
> > for empty slots in the page_array provided by the caller.
> >
> > The failure handling for post charging would be more complicated.
>
> If this is really that complicated (I haven't tried) then it would be
> much more simple to completely skip the bulk allocator for __GFP_ACCOUNT
> rather than add a tricky code. The bulk allocator is meant to be used
> for ultra hot paths and memcg charging along with the reclaim doesn't
> really fit into that model anyway. Or are there any actual users who
> really need bulk allocator optimization and also need memcg accounting?

Bulk allocator is being used for vmalloc and we have several
kvmalloc() with __GFP_ACCOUNT allocations.

It seems like Vasily has some ideas, so let's wait for his next version.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-13 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-07  8:04 memcg memory accounting in vmalloc is broken Vasily Averin
2021-10-07  8:13 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-07  8:16   ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-07  8:50     ` Vasily Averin
2021-10-07 10:08       ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-07 10:20       ` Mel Gorman
2021-10-07 14:02         ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-07 14:00       ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-07 14:09         ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-07 19:33       ` Vasily Averin
2021-10-08  9:23         ` [PATCH memcg] memcg: enable memory accounting in __alloc_pages_bulk Vasily Averin
2021-10-08 17:35           ` Shakeel Butt
2021-10-12 10:18             ` [PATCH mm v2] " Vasily Averin
2021-10-12 13:10               ` Mel Gorman
2021-10-12 13:40                 ` Vasily Averin
2021-10-12 14:58                   ` [PATCH mm v3] " Vasily Averin
2021-10-12 15:19                     ` Shakeel Butt
2021-10-12 15:20                     ` Mel Gorman
2021-10-12 15:36                     ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-12 16:08                       ` Shakeel Butt
2021-10-12 18:24                         ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-13 16:41                           ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2021-10-13 17:16                             ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-13 17:30                               ` Shakeel Butt
2021-10-12 18:45                       ` Vasily Averin
2021-10-14  8:02                   ` [PATCH mm v5] " Vasily Averin
2021-10-15 21:34                     ` Andrew Morton
2021-10-16  6:04                       ` Vasily Averin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALvZod6K6UXxDrkHp=mVDV7O-fAtmRkgMDngPazBhcyDUNxy_Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=vvs@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox