From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm v3] memcg: enable memory accounting in __alloc_pages_bulk
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 09:41:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALvZod6K6UXxDrkHp=mVDV7O-fAtmRkgMDngPazBhcyDUNxy_Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YWXS09ZBhZSy6FQQ@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:24 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue 12-10-21 09:08:38, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 8:36 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue 12-10-21 17:58:21, Vasily Averin wrote:
> > > > Enable memory accounting for bulk page allocator.
> > >
> > > ENOCHANGELOG
> > >
> > > And I have to say I am not very happy about the solution. It adds a very
> > > tricky code where it splits different charging steps apart.
> > >
> > > Would it be just too inefficient to charge page-by-page once all pages
> > > are already taken away from the pcp lists? This bulk should be small so
> > > this shouldn't really cause massive problems. I mean something like
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > index b37435c274cf..8bcd69195ef5 100644
> > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > @@ -5308,6 +5308,10 @@ unsigned long __alloc_pages_bulk(gfp_t gfp, int preferred_nid,
> > >
> > > local_unlock_irqrestore(&pagesets.lock, flags);
> > >
> > > + if (memcg_kmem_enabled() && (gfp & __GFP_ACCOUNT)) {
> > > + /* charge pages here */
> > > + }
> >
> > It is not that simple because __alloc_pages_bulk only allocate pages
> > for empty slots in the page_array provided by the caller.
> >
> > The failure handling for post charging would be more complicated.
>
> If this is really that complicated (I haven't tried) then it would be
> much more simple to completely skip the bulk allocator for __GFP_ACCOUNT
> rather than add a tricky code. The bulk allocator is meant to be used
> for ultra hot paths and memcg charging along with the reclaim doesn't
> really fit into that model anyway. Or are there any actual users who
> really need bulk allocator optimization and also need memcg accounting?
Bulk allocator is being used for vmalloc and we have several
kvmalloc() with __GFP_ACCOUNT allocations.
It seems like Vasily has some ideas, so let's wait for his next version.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-13 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-07 8:04 memcg memory accounting in vmalloc is broken Vasily Averin
2021-10-07 8:13 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-07 8:16 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-07 8:50 ` Vasily Averin
2021-10-07 10:08 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-07 10:20 ` Mel Gorman
2021-10-07 14:02 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-07 14:00 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-07 14:09 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-07 19:33 ` Vasily Averin
2021-10-08 9:23 ` [PATCH memcg] memcg: enable memory accounting in __alloc_pages_bulk Vasily Averin
2021-10-08 17:35 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-10-12 10:18 ` [PATCH mm v2] " Vasily Averin
2021-10-12 13:10 ` Mel Gorman
2021-10-12 13:40 ` Vasily Averin
2021-10-12 14:58 ` [PATCH mm v3] " Vasily Averin
2021-10-12 15:19 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-10-12 15:20 ` Mel Gorman
2021-10-12 15:36 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-12 16:08 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-10-12 18:24 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-13 16:41 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2021-10-13 17:16 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-13 17:30 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-10-12 18:45 ` Vasily Averin
2021-10-14 8:02 ` [PATCH mm v5] " Vasily Averin
2021-10-15 21:34 ` Andrew Morton
2021-10-16 6:04 ` Vasily Averin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALvZod6K6UXxDrkHp=mVDV7O-fAtmRkgMDngPazBhcyDUNxy_Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=vvs@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox