From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33C9C32771 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 19:00:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id F0E718E007E; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:00:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id EBCE48E0066; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:00:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id D84288E007E; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:00:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA63B8E0066 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:00:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin15.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8219E40B1D for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 19:00:20 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79955152200.15.80D6CA1 Received: from mail-yb1-f179.google.com (mail-yb1-f179.google.com [209.85.219.179]) by imf03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2709A20009 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 19:00:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yb1-f179.google.com with SMTP id j7so9573237ybb.8 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:00:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=qXIxC7hvTXMP9MB1PSPsSRSKcgWgbfgrr/VeVt3XfAQ=; b=kY6xlSFSYIIHIvjaNJS23jWOFKwiW1EPiXbC8vrod+Q+q2Cc3PWw1S+nstgMveEKWl 4G7V17L68GtrHi9sRrCNGa9SF3c35JwHDIFg32Mj1bSaBN9UdBmdjabUl7sVpb5qO2mH j0b/IhQl0aBvlv1Xndc3R5LkAJapRUSXW8/MKoEDAMYg7lk98Ri89xbAioeZ8vkTC4fZ xLcQl62yvW0eOPdk0vIbeYnrHszlSKHn/yXnK7OUkPA363it4nEYe5f3ue6BIpH0bPYZ Gdqe8GN6sGWeHnmy3JqmQZbgSMDgZSrgHueSkL7kKxqpkin8c5Ba+uywFJMii7Gk2GQQ HuDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=qXIxC7hvTXMP9MB1PSPsSRSKcgWgbfgrr/VeVt3XfAQ=; b=bcqltusKy2ee3oquWZwu+r3Nrn7G0x+OxuU5zQBkt82RwMf4ndGqkGz8JKpry+DyoJ /jCgIC8PISZGG8grUBSUXAYmjKDY+zy0NAJ8nBALy9/jna0bvjw6KCDEtjNGZ7mRBin3 Kgt8LbqVfjzFg51jkoaSCdU9mPcSRTdswaeCMt/1+BW8wS/Q3WUpAfMTbwJ0Ikl695ld lZZJB/RVz9AL4PyYE9fMaVOhEBwkB7jRb/oNEp/DcPvALD3ZJxWCSenFQ8f69ZKHh4e/ mhneZex0Ktg+UNwikcLqQnTol6n96WifVh6nkLRzJ8s8ZjoCYwOvLh4NMujb4/0JZy3g WvIg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf073PLqjjmiTcA9mR6+P9PZRlTx07MDPCkPw06xgOJB/N42mEvg eZFxTv8HXFuIQNT4NynX9RJfNfvwXxiFsemD136tkw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7SxCJVEVFMYzin9Elcyunq4Xv10GhdLdcX8nEOYWO+X6ltxZk1x1jbEGy4aD/N8X0U5vDplgCamqX9JZm6D1s= X-Received: by 2002:a25:84cf:0:b0:6b3:c0c3:19d8 with SMTP id x15-20020a2584cf000000b006b3c0c319d8mr20802543ybm.349.1664218819202; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:00:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6b362c6e-9c80-4344-9430-b831f9871a3c@openvz.org> <20220918092849.GA10314@u164.east.ru> <20220921170259.GI8331@blackbody.suse.cz> <20220926102812.2b0696a7@kernel.org> <20220926103631.8cb144a6d0b683915b0ecb10@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20220926103631.8cb144a6d0b683915b0ecb10@linux-foundation.org> From: Shakeel Butt Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:00:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [sparc64] fails to boot, (was: Re: [PATCH memcg v6] net: set proper memcg for net_init hooks allocations) To: Andrew Morton Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Vasily Averin , Anatoly Pugachev , =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Koutn=C3=BD?= , kernel@openvz.org, Linux Kernel list , linux-mm , Roman Gushchin , Vlastimil Babka , Michal Hocko , Florian Westphal , "David S. Miller" , Paolo Abeni , Eric Dumazet , Cgroups , Sparc kernel list , Thorsten Leemhuis , Linus Torvalds Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=kY6xlSFS; spf=pass (imf03.hostedemail.com: domain of shakeelb@google.com designates 209.85.219.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=shakeelb@google.com; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=google.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1664218820; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=kahAjhRAWYfKp7s5Nr01+2/OeZdSzrOiFDgWIjEyY0VpaNfDHdTaLpNM+3b5FKYsreOlns BCCmTp+uqkhW/enZ3cyf+rGiVlkVCyJzyBYsZIb48f8kuzIMqmx6dNkyzrk6azu2bA1TIQ q2foHAvQW2GPhl63dGRlpMdVVetIeYE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1664218820; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=qXIxC7hvTXMP9MB1PSPsSRSKcgWgbfgrr/VeVt3XfAQ=; b=6X1qGTw8g+sThK6sIufGcK7mcfaAG3OIdAwBI4I4drxcJXoD8zJlqSzfpu6S52vPgfztkY t7Hd7zyYl2dicIpPqgmby8YhWI6IurUi2Sp93HSdvH4ANZcDRULxfS6zZoJzU7aidoY+AC 8m1QbzeFXuSxr7QxIDYKVL/I5MuJ0ek= Authentication-Results: imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=kY6xlSFS; spf=pass (imf03.hostedemail.com: domain of shakeelb@google.com designates 209.85.219.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=shakeelb@google.com; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=google.com X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam12 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2709A20009 X-Stat-Signature: yighryug7nsxwfdfp4dgnrawxiipixqm X-HE-Tag: 1664218819-311294 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 10:36 AM Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:32:49 -0700 Shakeel Butt wrote: > > > > Forgive my uniformed chime-in but Linus seemed happy with the size of > > > -rc7 and now I'm worried there won't be an -rc8. AFAICT this is a 6.0 > > > regression. Vasily, Shakeel, do we have a plan to fix this? > > > > I was actually waiting for Vasily to respond. Anyways, I think the > > easiest way to proceed is to revert the commit 1d0403d20f6c ("net: set > > proper memcg for net_init hooks allocations"). We can debug the issue > > in the next cycle. > > If agreeable, could someone please send along a tested and changelogged > patch to do this? > I will send this revert soon and I think Anatoly has already tested the revert but I will let him add his tested-by tag.