From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg, oom: no oom-kill for __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 07:37:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALvZod6-EOAkcuiuBpoE6uR2DFNUkUY8syHxenFEAZTxhgNMhQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190429122214.GK21837@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 5:22 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun 28-04-19 16:56:13, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > The documentation of __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL clearly mentioned that the
> > OOM killer will not be triggered and indeed the page alloc does not
> > invoke OOM killer for such allocations. However we do trigger memcg
> > OOM killer for __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL. Fix that.
>
> An example of __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL memcg OOM report would be nice. I
> thought we haven't been using that flag for memcg allocations yet.
> But this is definitely good to have addressed.
Actually I am planning to use it for memcg allocations (specifically
fsnotify allocations).
>
> > Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
>
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Thanks.
>
> > ---
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 4 +---
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index 2713b45ec3f0..99eca724ed3b 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -2294,7 +2294,6 @@ static int try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
> > bool may_swap = true;
> > bool drained = false;
> > - bool oomed = false;
> > enum oom_status oom_status;
> >
> > if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
> > @@ -2381,7 +2380,7 @@ static int try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > if (nr_retries--)
> > goto retry;
> >
> > - if (gfp_mask & __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL && oomed)
> > + if (gfp_mask & __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL)
> > goto nomem;
> >
> > if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)
> > @@ -2400,7 +2399,6 @@ static int try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > switch (oom_status) {
> > case OOM_SUCCESS:
> > nr_retries = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
> > - oomed = true;
> > goto retry;
> > case OOM_FAILED:
> > goto force;
> > --
> > 2.21.0.593.g511ec345e18-goog
> >
>
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-29 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-28 23:56 Shakeel Butt
2019-04-29 12:22 ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-29 14:37 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2019-04-29 14:52 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALvZod6-EOAkcuiuBpoE6uR2DFNUkUY8syHxenFEAZTxhgNMhQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox