linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org,  Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	 Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Proactive Memory Reclaim
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:12:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALvZod5X7d38BO4byaWaKScibsJJPEj8KZx6t5Od1EXRvn_aOg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHbLzkp1HY0+x6ug8d43rpyQZqB9-Vh_vgbVF5-pcM=3FVVsWA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 9:50 AM Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Shakeel,
>
> This sounds interesting. Actually, we have something similar designed
> in-house (called "cold" page reclaim). But, we mainly targeted to cold
> page cache rather than anonymous page for the time being, and it does
> in cgroup scope. We are extending it to anonymous page now.
>
> Look forward to discussing with you.
>

Hi Yang,

Thanks for the info. Is this per-cgroup "cold page reclaim" is
triggered by the job themselves? Are the jobs trying to avoid memcg
limit reclaim by proactively reclaiming their own memory?

Shakeel


  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-23 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-23 15:30 Shakeel Butt
2019-04-23 15:58 ` Mel Gorman
2019-04-23 16:33   ` Shakeel Butt
2019-04-23 16:49     ` Yang Shi
2019-04-23 17:12       ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2019-04-23 18:26         ` Yang Shi
2019-04-23 16:08 ` Rik van Riel
2019-04-23 17:04   ` Shakeel Butt
2019-04-23 17:49     ` Johannes Weiner
2019-04-23 17:34   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-04-23 17:31 ` Johannes Weiner
2019-04-24 16:28   ` Christopher Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALvZod5X7d38BO4byaWaKScibsJJPEj8KZx6t5Od1EXRvn_aOg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox