linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 2/5] mm: memcontrol: do not try to do swap when force empty
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 16:43:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALvZod5Fh0K-JKGPH90c+ONBSTdwo7Z8fUyyAMen=ZDzPqTAXQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1546647560-40026-3-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>

On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 4:21 PM Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> The typical usecase of force empty is to try to reclaim as much as
> possible memory before offlining a memcg.  Since there should be no
> attached tasks to offlining memcg, the tasks anonymous pages would have
> already been freed or uncharged.  Even though anonymous pages get
> swapped out, but they still get charged to swap space.  So, it sounds
> pointless to do swap for force empty.
>
> I tried to dig into the history of this, it was introduced by
> commit 8c7c6e34a125 ("memcg: mem+swap controller core"), but there is
> not any clue about why it was done so at the first place.
>
> The below simple test script shows slight file cache reclaim improvement
> when swap is on.
>
> echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test
> echo 30 > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/memory.swappiness
> echo $$ >/sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/cgroup.procs
> cat /proc/meminfo | grep ^Cached|awk -F" " '{print $2}'
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test bs=1M count=1024
> ping localhost > /dev/null &
> echo 1 > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/memory.force_empty
> killall ping
> echo $$ >/sys/fs/cgroup/memory/cgroup.procs
> cat /proc/meminfo | grep ^Cached|awk -F" " '{print $2}'
> rmdir /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test
> cat /proc/meminfo | grep ^Cached|awk -F" " '{print $2}'
>
> The number of page cache is:
>                         w/o             w/
> before force empty    1088792        1088784
> after force empty     41492          39428
> reclaimed             1047300        1049356
>
> Without doing swap, force empty can reclaim 2MB more memory in 1GB page
> cache.
>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index af7f18b..75208a2 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2895,7 +2895,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>                         return -EINTR;
>
>                 progress = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, 1,
> -                                                       GFP_KERNEL, true);
> +                                                       GFP_KERNEL, false);

I think we agreed not to change the behavior of force_empty. You can
customize 'force_empty on wipe_on_offline' to not swapout.

>                 if (!progress) {
>                         nr_retries--;
>                         /* maybe some writeback is necessary */
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-05  0:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-05  0:19 [RFC v2 PATCH 0/5] mm: memcontrol: do memory reclaim when offlining Yang Shi
2019-01-05  0:19 ` [v2 PATCH 1/5] doc: memcontrol: fix the obsolete content about force empty Yang Shi
2019-01-05  0:19 ` [v2 PATCH 2/5] mm: memcontrol: do not try to do swap when " Yang Shi
2019-01-05  0:43   ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2019-01-05  0:43     ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-09 17:55     ` Yang Shi
2019-01-05  0:19 ` [v2 PATCH 3/5] mm: memcontrol: introduce wipe_on_offline interface Yang Shi
2019-01-05  0:47   ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-05  0:47     ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-09 17:59     ` Yang Shi
2019-01-05  0:19 ` [v2 PATCH 4/5] mm: memcontrol: bring force_empty into default hierarchy Yang Shi
2019-01-05  0:19 ` [v2 PATCH 5/5] doc: memcontrol: add description for wipe_on_offline Yang Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALvZod5Fh0K-JKGPH90c+ONBSTdwo7Z8fUyyAMen=ZDzPqTAXQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox