From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: fix NR_WRITEBACK leak in memcg and system stats
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 07:44:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALvZod5-35Y+_eot6-6J5HyssnmAW-wfYhuQdxxA9Zj8Ng2e+g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180203082353.17284-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
> After the ("a983b5ebee57 mm: memcontrol: fix excessive complexity in
> memory.stat reporting"), we observed slowly upward creeping
> NR_WRITEBACK counts over the course of several days, both the
> per-memcg stats as well as the system counter in e.g. /proc/meminfo.
>
> The conversion from full per-cpu stat counts to per-cpu cached atomic
> stat counts introduced an irq-unsafe RMW operation into the updates.
>
> Most stat updates come from process context, but one notable exception
> is the NR_WRITEBACK counter. While writebacks are issued from process
> context, they are retired from (soft)irq context.
>
> When writeback completions interrupt the RMW counter updates of new
> writebacks being issued, the decs from the completions are lost.
>
> Since the global updates are routed through the joint lruvec API, both
> the memcg counters as well as the system counters are affected.
>
> This patch makes the joint stat and event API irq safe.
>
> Fixes: a983b5ebee57 ("mm: memcontrol: fix excessive complexity in memory.stat reporting")
> Debugged-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Should this be considered for stable?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-07 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-03 8:23 Johannes Weiner
2018-02-03 18:23 ` Rik van Riel
2018-02-07 15:44 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2018-02-07 16:55 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALvZod5-35Y+_eot6-6J5HyssnmAW-wfYhuQdxxA9Zj8Ng2e+g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox