linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	 Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 regressions@lists.linux.dev, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
	 Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,  Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	 Raghuram Thammiraju <raghuram.thammiraju@arm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,  Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	 Vasily Averin <vvs@openvz.org>,
	Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [next] arm64: boot failed - next-20220606
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 23:44:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALvZod4DhM00LXsPty=cnYyv3Ci5YS5otasu_tr9o7ujQekKLw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALvZod5XBjw7MZfYSNv-UnE7pHMKTquUNomqyC5T05Qu_ef6Zw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 11:36 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 11:25 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Naresh,
> >
> > On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 11:00:39 +0530 Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 17:16, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Linux next-20220606 arm64 boot failed. The kernel boot log is empty.
> > > > I am bisecting this problem.
> > > >
> > > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> > > >
> > > > The initial investigation show that,
> > > >
> > > > GOOD: next-20220603
> > > > BAD:  next-20220606
> > > >
> > > > Boot log:
> > > > Starting kernel ...
> > >
> > > Linux next-20220606 and next-20220607 arm64 boot failed.
> > > The kernel panic log showing after earlycon.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> >
> > Can you test v5.19-rc1, please?  If that does not fail, then you could
> > bisect between that and next-20220606 ...
> >
>
> This is already reported at
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yp4F6n2Ie32re7Ed@qian/ and I think we know
> the underlying issue (which is calling virt_to_page() on a vmalloc
> address).

Sorry, I might be wrong. Just checked the stacktrace again and it
seems like the failure is happening in early boot in this report.
Though the error "Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual
address" is happening in the function mem_cgroup_from_obj().

Naresh, can you repro the issue if you revert the patch "net: set
proper memcg for net_init hooks allocations"?


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-07  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-06 11:46 Naresh Kamboju
2022-06-07  5:30 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-06-07  6:25   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-07  6:36     ` Shakeel Butt
2022-06-07  6:44       ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2022-06-07 10:27         ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-06-07 14:17           ` Shakeel Butt
2022-06-07 15:29             ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-06-09  2:49               ` Vasily Averin
2022-06-09  3:44                 ` Kefeng Wang
2022-06-09  4:43                   ` Kefeng Wang
2022-06-09  5:19                     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-06-09 10:11                   ` Will Deacon
2022-06-09 10:25                     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-06-09 15:23                       ` Shakeel Butt
2022-06-07 10:24     ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-06-09 17:26   ` Roman Gushchin
2022-06-09 17:47     ` Shakeel Butt
2022-06-09 17:56       ` Roman Gushchin
2022-06-09 19:12         ` Shakeel Butt
2022-06-09 22:05           ` Roman Gushchin
2022-06-09 22:16             ` Shakeel Butt
2022-06-10 10:56     ` Naresh Kamboju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALvZod4DhM00LXsPty=cnYyv3Ci5YS5otasu_tr9o7ujQekKLw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=quic_qiancai@quicinc.com \
    --cc=raghuram.thammiraju@arm.com \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=vvs@openvz.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox