I have not had time to get into this. I was hoping you could come up with
something.

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Alex,Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 23:04 +0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > Sorry to be that late with a response but my email setup is screwed
> > up.
> >
> > I was more thinking about the number of slab pages in the partial
> > caches rather than the size of the objects itself being an issue. I
> > believe that was /sys/kernel/slab/*/cpu_partial.
> >
> > That setting could be tuned further before merging. An increase there
> > causes additional memory to be caught in the partial list. But it
> > reduces the node lock pressure further.
> >
>
> Yeah, I think so. The more cpu partial page, the quicker to getting
> slabs. Maybe it's better to considerate the system memory size to set
> them. Do you has some plan or suggestions on tunning?
>
>
>
>
>