From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
To: Richard Lee <superlibj8301@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Richard Lee <superlibj@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] mm/vmalloc: Add IO mapping space reused interface.
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 22:13:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqK=BiZx31xUC=_8s7+QeAGjrWePOzeDLEt=YfpdLbS_KA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399861195-21087-2-git-send-email-superlibj8301@gmail.com>
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Richard Lee <superlibj8301@gmail.com> wrote:
> For the IO mapping, for the same physical address space maybe
> mapped more than one time, for example, in some SoCs:
> 0x20000000 ~ 0x20001000: are global control IO physical map,
> and this range space will be used by many drivers.
What address or who the user is isn't really relevant.
> And then if each driver will do the same ioremap operation, we
> will waste to much malloc virtual spaces.
s/malloc/vmalloc/
>
> This patch add the IO mapping space reusing interface:
> - find_vm_area_paddr: used to find the exsit vmalloc area using
s/exsit/exist/
> the IO physical address.
> - vm_area_is_aready_to_free: before vfree the IO mapped areas
> using this to do the check that if this area is used by more
> than one consumer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Lee <superlibj@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/vmalloc.h | 5 ++++
> mm/vmalloc.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/vmalloc.h b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
> index 4b8a891..2b811f6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vmalloc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ struct vm_struct {
> struct page **pages;
> unsigned int nr_pages;
> phys_addr_t phys_addr;
> + unsigned int used;
> const void *caller;
> };
>
> @@ -100,6 +101,10 @@ static inline size_t get_vm_area_size(const struct vm_struct *area)
> return area->size - PAGE_SIZE;
> }
>
> +extern int vm_area_is_aready_to_free(phys_addr_t addr);
> +struct vm_struct *find_vm_area_paddr(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
> + unsigned long *offset,
> + unsigned long flags);
> extern struct vm_struct *get_vm_area(unsigned long size, unsigned long flags);
> extern struct vm_struct *get_vm_area_caller(unsigned long size,
> unsigned long flags, const void *caller);
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index bf233b2..f75b7b3 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -1293,6 +1293,7 @@ static void setup_vmalloc_vm(struct vm_struct *vm, struct vmap_area *va,
> vm->addr = (void *)va->va_start;
> vm->size = va->va_end - va->va_start;
> vm->caller = caller;
> + vm->used = 1;
> va->vm = vm;
> va->flags |= VM_VM_AREA;
> spin_unlock(&vmap_area_lock);
> @@ -1383,6 +1384,68 @@ struct vm_struct *get_vm_area_caller(unsigned long size, unsigned long flags,
> NUMA_NO_NODE, GFP_KERNEL, caller);
> }
>
> +int vm_area_is_aready_to_free(phys_addr_t addr)
aready is not a word.
> +{
> + struct vmap_area *va;
> +
> + va = find_vmap_area((unsigned long)addr);
> + if (!va || !(va->flags & VM_VM_AREA) || !va->vm)
> + return 1;
> +
> + if (va->vm->used <= 1)
> + return 1;
> +
> + --va->vm->used;
What lock protects this? You should use atomic ops here.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * find_vm_area_paddr - find a continuous kernel virtual area using the
> + * physical addreess.
> + * @paddr: base physical address
> + * @size: size of the physical area range
> + * @offset: the start offset of the vm area
> + * @flags: %VM_IOREMAP for I/O mappings
> + *
> + * Search for the kernel VM area, whoes physical address starting at @paddr,
> + * and if the exsit VM area's size is large enough, then just return it, or
> + * return NULL.
> + */
> +struct vm_struct *find_vm_area_paddr(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
> + unsigned long *offset,
> + unsigned long flags)
> +{
> + struct vmap_area *va;
> +
> + if (!(flags & VM_IOREMAP))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(va, &vmap_area_list, list) {
> + phys_addr_t phys_addr;
> +
> + if (!va || !(va->flags & VM_VM_AREA) || !va->vm)
> + continue;
> +
> + phys_addr = va->vm->phys_addr;
> +
> + if (paddr < phys_addr || paddr + size > phys_addr + va->vm->size)
> + continue;
> +
> + *offset = paddr - phys_addr;
> +
> + if (va->vm->flags & VM_IOREMAP && va->vm->size >= size) {
> + va->vm->used++;
What lock protects this? It looks like you are modifying this with
only a rcu reader lock.
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + return va->vm;
> + }
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * find_vm_area - find a continuous kernel virtual area
> * @addr: base address
> --
> 1.8.4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-13 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-12 2:19 [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Add IO mapping space reused support Richard Lee
2014-05-12 2:19 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] mm/vmalloc: Add IO mapping space reused interface Richard Lee
2014-05-13 3:13 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2014-05-13 6:21 ` Richard Lee
2014-05-12 2:19 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] ARM: ioremap: Add IO mapping space reused support Richard Lee
2014-05-12 7:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-13 1:45 ` Richard Lee
2014-05-13 8:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-14 2:13 ` Richard Lee
2014-05-15 10:17 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAL_JsqK=BiZx31xUC=_8s7+QeAGjrWePOzeDLEt=YfpdLbS_KA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=superlibj8301@gmail.com \
--cc=superlibj@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox