From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com (mail-we0-f171.google.com [74.125.82.171]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79506B00A1 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 17:23:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id t61so6622830wes.2 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 14:23:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com (mail-we0-x235.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c03::235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a20si3902523wjx.207.2014.04.12.14.23.53 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 12 Apr 2014 14:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id q58so6767357wes.12 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 14:23:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Dan Streetman Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 17:23:31 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: 0/N patch emails - to use or not to use? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Linux-MM Hi Andrew, I noticed in your The Perfect Patch doc: http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/stuff/tpp.txt Section 6b says you don't like 0/N patch series description-only emails. Is that still true? Because it seems the majority of patch series do include a 0/N descriptive email... -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org