From: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] memcg: skip scanning active lists based on individual size
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:19:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALWz4iwyQ=tLnjx5=KH5kjgJbcjfNVyxS97V0KzXZUenrLAcnA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110831090850.GA27345@redhat.com>
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com> wrote:
> Reclaim decides to skip scanning an active list when the corresponding
> inactive list is above a certain size in comparison to leave the
> assumed working set alone while there are still enough reclaim
> candidates around.
>
> The memcg implementation of comparing those lists instead reports
> whether the whole memcg is low on the requested type of inactive
> pages, considering all nodes and zones.
>
> This can lead to an oversized active list not being scanned because of
> the state of the other lists in the memcg, as well as an active list
> being scanned while its corresponding inactive list has enough pages.
>
> Not only is this wrong, it's also a scalability hazard, because the
> global memory state over all nodes and zones has to be gathered for
> each memcg and zone scanned.
>
> Make these calculations purely based on the size of the two LRU lists
> that are actually affected by the outcome of the decision.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 10 +++++---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 51 ++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> mm/vmscan.c | 4 +-
> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 343bd76..cbb45ce 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -105,8 +105,10 @@ extern void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> /*
> * For memory reclaim.
> */
> -int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
> -int mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
> +int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> + struct zone *zone);
> +int mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> + struct zone *zone);
> int mem_cgroup_select_victim_node(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
> unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> int nid, int zid, unsigned int lrumask);
> @@ -292,13 +294,13 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_disabled(void)
> }
>
> static inline int
> -mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
> {
> return 1;
> }
>
> static inline int
> -mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
> {
> return 1;
> }
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 3508777..d63dfb2 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1101,15 +1101,19 @@ int task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task, const struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int calc_inactive_ratio(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned long *present_pages)
> +int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
> {
> - unsigned long active;
> + unsigned long inactive_ratio;
> + int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
> + int zid = zone_idx(zone);
> unsigned long inactive;
> + unsigned long active;
> unsigned long gb;
> - unsigned long inactive_ratio;
>
> - inactive = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, BIT(LRU_INACTIVE_ANON));
> - active = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, BIT(LRU_ACTIVE_ANON));
> + inactive = mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid,
> + BIT(LRU_INACTIVE_ANON));
> + active = mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid,
> + BIT(LRU_ACTIVE_ANON));
>
> gb = (inactive + active) >> (30 - PAGE_SHIFT);
> if (gb)
> @@ -1117,39 +1121,20 @@ static int calc_inactive_ratio(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned long *present_
> else
> inactive_ratio = 1;
>
> - if (present_pages) {
> - present_pages[0] = inactive;
> - present_pages[1] = active;
> - }
> -
> - return inactive_ratio;
> + return inactive * inactive_ratio < active;
> }
>
> -int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> -{
> - unsigned long active;
> - unsigned long inactive;
> - unsigned long present_pages[2];
> - unsigned long inactive_ratio;
> -
> - inactive_ratio = calc_inactive_ratio(memcg, present_pages);
> -
> - inactive = present_pages[0];
> - active = present_pages[1];
> -
> - if (inactive * inactive_ratio < active)
> - return 1;
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -int mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +int mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
> {
> unsigned long active;
> unsigned long inactive;
> + int zid = zone_idx(zone);
> + int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
>
> - inactive = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, BIT(LRU_INACTIVE_FILE));
> - active = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, BIT(LRU_ACTIVE_FILE));
> + inactive = mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid,
> + BIT(LRU_INACTIVE_FILE));
> + active = mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid,
> + BIT(LRU_ACTIVE_FILE));
>
> return (active > inactive);
> }
> @@ -4188,8 +4173,6 @@ static int mem_control_stat_show(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> - cb->fill(cb, "inactive_ratio", calc_inactive_ratio(mem_cont, NULL));
> -
> {
> int nid, zid;
> struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 6588746..a023778 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1699,7 +1699,7 @@ static int inactive_anon_is_low(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
> if (scanning_global_lru(sc))
> low = inactive_anon_is_low_global(zone);
> else
> - low = mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(sc->mem_cgroup);
> + low = mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(sc->mem_cgroup, zone);
> return low;
> }
> #else
> @@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ static int inactive_file_is_low(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
> if (scanning_global_lru(sc))
> low = inactive_file_is_low_global(zone);
> else
> - low = mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(sc->mem_cgroup);
> + low = mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(sc->mem_cgroup, zone);
> return low;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.6
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>
Reviewed-by: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
--Ying
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-31 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-31 9:08 Johannes Weiner
2011-08-31 10:13 ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-31 12:30 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-01 0:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-01 6:15 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-01 6:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-05 18:25 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-06 9:33 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-06 10:43 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-06 10:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-08-31 17:19 ` Ying Han [this message]
2011-08-31 18:27 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALWz4iwyQ=tLnjx5=KH5kjgJbcjfNVyxS97V0KzXZUenrLAcnA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=yinghan@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox