From: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/8] mm: memcg-aware global reclaim
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:22:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALWz4iwRXBheXFND5zq3ze2PJDkeoxYHD1zOsTyzOe3XqY5apA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALWz4iwJfyWRineMy+W02YBvS0Y=Pv1y8Rb=8i5R=vUCfrO+iQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 01:39:45PM -0700, Ying Han wrote:
>> > Please consider including the following patch for the next post. It causes
>> > crash on some of the tests where sc->mem_cgroup is NULL (global kswapd).
>> >
>> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>> > index b72a844..12ab25d 100644
>> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>> > @@ -2768,7 +2768,8 @@ loop_again:
>> > * Do some background aging of the anon list, to
>> > give
>> > * pages a chance to be referenced before
>> > reclaiming.
>> > */
>> > - if (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, &sc))
>> > + if (scanning_global_lru(&sc) &&
>> > + inactive_anon_is_low(zone, &sc))
>> > shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, zone,
>> > &sc, priority, 0);
>>
>> Thanks! I completely overlooked this one and only noticed it after
>> changing the arguments to shrink_active_list().
>>
>> On memcg configurations, scanning_global_lru() will essentially never
>> be true again, so I moved the anon pre-aging to a separate function
>> that also does a hierarchy loop to preage the per-memcg anon lists.
>>
>> I hope to send out the next revision soon.
>
> Also, please consider to fold in the following patch as well. It fixes
> the root cgroup lru accounting and we could easily trigger OOM while
> doing some swapoff test w/o it.
>
> mm:fix the lru accounting for root cgroup.
>
> This patch is applied on top of:
> "
> mm: memcg-aware global reclaim
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> "
>
> This patch fixes the lru accounting for root cgroup.
>
> After the "memcg-aware global reclaim" patch, one of the changes is to have
> lru pages linked back to root. Under the global memory pressure, we start from
> the root cgroup lru and walk through the memcg hierarchy of the system. For
> each memcg, we reclaim pages based on the its lru size.
>
> However for root cgroup, we used not having a seperate lru and only counting
> the pages charged to root as part of root lru size. Without this patch, all
> the pages which are linked to root lru but not charged to root like swapcache
> readahead are not visible to page reclaim code and we are easily to get OOM.
>
> After this patch, all the pages linked under root lru are counted in the lru
> size, including Used and !Used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 5518f54..f6c5f29 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -888,19 +888,21 @@ void mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(struct page *page,
> enum lru_list lru)
> {
> >------struct page_cgroup *pc;
> >------struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
> +>------struct mem_cgroup *mem;
> ·
> >------if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> >------>-------return;
> >------pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> ->------/* can happen while we handle swapcache. */
> ->------if (!TestClearPageCgroupAcctLRU(pc))
> ->------>-------return;
> ->------VM_BUG_ON(!pc->mem_cgroup);
> ->------/*
> ->------ * We don't check PCG_USED bit. It's cleared when the "page" is finally
> ->------ * removed from global LRU.
> ->------ */
> ->------mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc->mem_cgroup, page);
> +
> +>------if (TestClearPageCgroupAcctLRU(pc) || PageCgroupUsed(pc)) {
> +>------>-------VM_BUG_ON(!pc->mem_cgroup);
> +>------>-------mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
> +>------} else {
> +>------>-------/* can happen while we handle swapcache. */
> +>------>-------mem = root_mem_cgroup;
> +>------}
> +
> +>------mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, page);
> >------MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) -= 1;
> >------VM_BUG_ON(list_empty(&pc->lru));
> >------list_del_init(&pc->lru);
> @@ -961,22 +963,31 @@ void mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(struct page *page,
> enum lru_list lru)
> {
> >------struct page_cgroup *pc;
> >------struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
> +>------struct mem_cgroup *mem;
> ·
> >------if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> >------>-------return;
> >------pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> >------VM_BUG_ON(PageCgroupAcctLRU(pc));
> ->------/*
> ->------ * Used bit is set without atomic ops but after smp_wmb().
> ->------ * For making pc->mem_cgroup visible, insert smp_rmb() here.
> ->------ */
> ->------smp_rmb();
> ->------if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
> ->------>-------return;
> ·
> ->------mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc->mem_cgroup, page);
> +>------if (PageCgroupUsed(pc)) {
> +>------>-------/* Ensure pc->mem_cgroup is visible after reading PCG_USED. */
> +>------>-------smp_rmb();
> +>------>-------mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
> +>------>-------SetPageCgroupAcctLRU(pc);
> +>------} else {
> +>------>-------/*
> +>------>------- * If the page is no longer charged, add it to the
> +>------>------- * root memcg's lru. Either it will be freed soon, or
> +>------>------- * it will get charged again and the charger will
> +>------>------- * relink it to the right list.
> +>------>-------mem = root_mem_cgroup;
> +>------}
> +
> +>------mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, page);
> >------MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) += 1;
> ->------SetPageCgroupAcctLRU(pc);
> +
> >------list_add(&pc->lru, &mz->lists[lru]);
> }
>
> --Ying
>
And this patch fixes the hierarchy_walk :
fix hierarchy_walk() to hold a reference to first mem_cgroup
The first mem_cgroup returned from hierarchy_walk() is used to
terminate a round-trip. However there is no reference hold on
that which the first could be removed during the walking. The
patch including the following change:
1. hold a reference on the first mem_cgroup during the walk.
2. rename the variable "root" to "target", which we found using
"root" is confusing in this content with root_mem_cgroup. better
naming is welcomed.
Signed-off-by: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 10 +++++++---
mm/memcontrol.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
mm/vmscan.c | 10 +++++-----
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 15b713b..4de12ca 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -104,8 +104,10 @@ extern void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct
mem_cgroup *mem,
>------struct page *oldpage, struct page *newpage);
·
struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_hierarchy_walk(struct mem_cgroup *,
+>------>------->------->------->------- struct mem_cgroup *,
>------>------->------->------->------- struct mem_cgroup *);
-void mem_cgroup_stop_hierarchy_walk(struct mem_cgroup *, struct mem_cgroup *);
+void mem_cgroup_stop_hierarchy_walk(struct mem_cgroup *, struct mem_cgroup *,
+>------>------->------->------- struct mem_cgroup *);
·
/*
* For memory reclaim.
@@ -332,13 +334,15 @@ mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page(struct page *page)
>------return NULL;
}
·
-static inline struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_hierarchy_walk(struct
mem_cgroup *r,
+static inline struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_hierarchy_walk(struct
mem_cgroup *t,
+>------>------->------->------->------->------->------- struct mem_cgroup *f,
>------>------->------->------->------->------->------- struct mem_cgroup *m)
{
>------return NULL;
}
·
-static inline void mem_cgroup_stop_hierarchy_walk(struct mem_cgroup *r,
+static inline void mem_cgroup_stop_hierarchy_walk(struct mem_cgroup *t,
+>------>------->------->------->------->------- struct mem_cgroup *f,
>------>------->------->------->------->------- struct mem_cgroup *m)
{
}
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index f6c5f29..80b62aa 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1447,60 +1447,67 @@ u64 mem_cgroup_get_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
·
/**
* mem_cgroup_hierarchy_walk - iterate over a memcg hierarchy
- * @root: starting point of the hierarchy
+ * @target: starting point of the hierarchy
+ * @first: first node of the scanning
* @prev: previous position or NULL
*
- * Caller must hold a reference to @root. While this function will
- * return @root as part of the walk, it will never increase its
+ * Caller must hold a reference to @parent. While this function will
+ * return @parent as part of the walk, it will never increase its
* reference count.
*
* Caller must clean up with mem_cgroup_stop_hierarchy_walk() when it
* stops the walk potentially before the full round trip.
*/
-struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_hierarchy_walk(struct mem_cgroup *root,
+struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_hierarchy_walk(struct mem_cgroup *target,
+>------>------->------->------->------- struct mem_cgroup *first,
>------>------->------->------->------- struct mem_cgroup *prev)
{
->------struct mem_cgroup *mem;
+>------struct mem_cgroup *mem = NULL;
·
>------if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
>------>-------return NULL;
·
->------if (!root)
->------>-------root = root_mem_cgroup;
+>------if (!target)
+>------>-------target = root_mem_cgroup;
>------/*
>------ * Even without hierarchy explicitely enabled in the root
>------ * memcg, it is the ultimate parent of all memcgs.
>------ */
->------if (!(root == root_mem_cgroup || root->use_hierarchy))
->------>-------return root;
->------if (prev && prev != root)
+>------if (!(target == root_mem_cgroup || target->use_hierarchy))
+>------>-------return target;
+>------if (prev && prev != target && prev != first)
>------>-------css_put(&prev->css);
>------do {
->------>-------int id = root->last_scanned_child;
+>------>-------int id = target->last_scanned_child;
>------>-------struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
·
>------>-------rcu_read_lock();
->------>-------css = css_get_next(&mem_cgroup_subsys, id + 1, &root->css, &id);
->------>-------if (css && (css == &root->css || css_tryget(css)))
+>------>-------css = css_get_next(&mem_cgroup_subsys, id + 1,
&target->css, &id);
+>------>-------if (css && (css == &target->css || css_tryget(css)))
>------>------->-------mem = container_of(css, struct mem_cgroup, css);
>------>-------rcu_read_unlock();
>------>-------if (!css)
>------>------->-------id = 0;
->------>-------root->last_scanned_child = id;
+>------>-------target->last_scanned_child = id;
>------} while (!mem);
>------return mem;
}
·
/**
* mem_cgroup_stop_hierarchy_walk - clean up after partial hierarchy walk
- * @root: starting point in the hierarchy
+ * @target: starting point in the hierarchy
+ * @first: first node of the scanning
* @mem: last position during the walk
*/
-void mem_cgroup_stop_hierarchy_walk(struct mem_cgroup *root,
+void mem_cgroup_stop_hierarchy_walk(struct mem_cgroup *target,
+>------>------->------->------- struct mem_cgroup *first,
>------>------->------->------- struct mem_cgroup *mem)
{
->------if (mem && mem != root)
+>------if (mem && mem != target)
>------>-------css_put(&mem->css);
+
+>------if (first && first != mem && first != target)
+>------>-------css_put(&first->css);
}
·
static unsigned long mem_cgroup_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 3bcb212..aee958a 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1751,10 +1751,10 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
>------>------->-------struct scan_control *sc)
{
>------unsigned long nr_reclaimed_before = sc->nr_reclaimed;
->------struct mem_cgroup *root = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
->------struct mem_cgroup *first, *mem = NULL;
+>------struct mem_cgroup *target = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
+>------struct mem_cgroup *first, *mem;
·
->------first = mem = mem_cgroup_hierarchy_walk(root, mem);
+>------first = mem = mem_cgroup_hierarchy_walk(target, NULL, NULL);
>------for (;;) {
>------>-------unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
·
@@ -1765,11 +1765,11 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
>------>-------if (nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim)
>------>------->-------break;
·
->------>-------mem = mem_cgroup_hierarchy_walk(root, mem);
+>------>-------mem = mem_cgroup_hierarchy_walk(target, first, mem);
>------>-------if (mem == first)
>------>------->-------break;
>------}
->------mem_cgroup_stop_hierarchy_walk(root, mem);
+>------mem_cgroup_stop_hierarchy_walk(target, first, mem);
}
--Ying
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-29 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-01 6:25 [patch 0/8] mm: memcg naturalization -rc2 Johannes Weiner
2011-06-01 6:25 ` [patch 1/8] memcg: remove unused retry signal from reclaim Johannes Weiner
2011-06-01 6:25 ` [patch 2/8] mm: memcg-aware global reclaim Johannes Weiner
2011-06-02 13:59 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2011-06-02 15:01 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-02 16:14 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2011-06-02 17:29 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-09 14:01 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-07 12:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-08 9:30 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-09 9:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-09 16:57 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-09 13:12 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-09 13:45 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-09 15:48 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-09 17:23 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-09 23:41 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-09 23:47 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-10 0:34 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-10 0:48 ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-11 20:39 ` Ying Han
2011-08-11 21:09 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-29 7:15 ` Ying Han
2011-08-29 7:22 ` Ying Han [this message]
2011-08-29 7:57 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-30 6:08 ` Ying Han
2011-08-29 19:04 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-29 20:36 ` Ying Han
2011-08-29 21:05 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-30 7:07 ` Ying Han
2011-08-30 15:14 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-31 22:58 ` Ying Han
2011-09-21 8:44 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-29 8:07 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-01 6:25 ` [patch 3/8] memcg: reclaim statistics Johannes Weiner
2011-06-01 6:25 ` [patch 4/8] memcg: rework soft limit reclaim Johannes Weiner
2011-06-02 5:37 ` Ying Han
2011-06-02 21:55 ` Ying Han
2011-06-03 5:25 ` Ying Han
2011-06-09 15:00 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-10 7:36 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-15 22:57 ` Ying Han
2011-06-16 0:33 ` Ying Han
2011-06-16 11:45 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-15 22:48 ` Ying Han
2011-06-16 11:41 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-01 6:25 ` [patch 5/8] memcg: remove unused soft limit code Johannes Weiner
2011-06-13 9:26 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-01 6:25 ` [patch 6/8] vmscan: change zone_nr_lru_pages to take memcg instead of scan control Johannes Weiner
2011-06-02 13:30 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2011-06-02 14:28 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-13 9:29 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-01 6:25 ` [patch 7/8] vmscan: memcg-aware unevictable page rescue scanner Johannes Weiner
2011-06-02 13:27 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2011-06-02 14:27 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-02 21:02 ` Ying Han
2011-06-02 22:01 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2011-06-02 22:19 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-02 23:15 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2011-06-03 5:08 ` Ying Han
2011-06-13 9:42 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-13 10:30 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-13 11:18 ` Michal Hocko
2011-07-19 22:47 ` Ying Han
2011-07-20 0:36 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-29 7:28 ` Ying Han
2011-08-29 7:59 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-01 6:25 ` [patch 8/8] mm: make per-memcg lru lists exclusive Johannes Weiner
2011-06-02 13:16 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2011-06-02 14:24 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-02 15:54 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2011-06-02 17:57 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-08 15:04 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-07 12:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-08 8:54 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-09 9:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-11 20:33 ` Ying Han
2011-08-12 8:34 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-12 17:08 ` Ying Han
2011-08-12 19:17 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-15 3:01 ` Ying Han
2011-08-15 1:34 ` Ying Han
2011-08-15 9:39 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-01 23:52 ` [patch 0/8] mm: memcg naturalization -rc2 Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2011-06-02 0:35 ` Greg Thelen
2011-06-09 1:13 ` Rik van Riel
2011-06-02 4:05 ` Ying Han
2011-06-02 7:50 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-02 15:51 ` Ying Han
2011-06-02 17:51 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-08 3:45 ` Ying Han
2011-06-08 3:53 ` Ying Han
2011-06-08 15:32 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-09 3:52 ` Ying Han
2011-06-09 8:35 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-09 17:36 ` Ying Han
2011-06-09 18:36 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-09 21:38 ` Ying Han
2011-06-09 22:30 ` Ying Han
2011-06-09 23:31 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-10 0:17 ` Ying Han
2011-06-02 7:33 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-02 9:06 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2011-06-02 10:00 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-02 12:59 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2011-06-09 1:15 ` Rik van Riel
2011-06-09 8:43 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-06-09 9:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-13 9:47 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-13 10:35 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALWz4iwRXBheXFND5zq3ze2PJDkeoxYHD1zOsTyzOe3XqY5apA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yinghan@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox