linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org,
	 linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, doc: Update read_ahead_kb for MADV_HUGEPAGE
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:06:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALOAHbD0SpHw7eYGPrt7-RqC4S-br1kjme9vcLhyQ7ApEFq5kw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZzV-OUHBN04yV9hR@infradead.org>

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 12:36 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 11:07:11PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
> > +             For MADV_HUGEPAGE, the readahead size may exceed this setting
> > +             since its granularity is based on the hugepage size.
>
> What does this actually mean?

This means that when read_ahead_kb is set to 128KB, using
MADV_HUGEPAGE will trigger a 4MB readahead, exceeding the specified
limit.

>
> Also this whole read_ahead_kb has been a massive pain, can we maybe
> take a step back and figure out if we still need it at all, and
> if yes how we can improve it?  In times where we support page cache
> folio sie up to 1M, having a tiny read ahead window is pretty silly,
> especially as basically all I/O is done through the "readahead"
> interface anyway.
>

I believe the long-term goal should be to eliminate this interface,
allowing the kernel to automatically adjust the readahead size based
on the device’s bandwidth and latency. However, implementing this
would be challenging. In the meantime, this patch updates
read_ahead_kb to accommodate the newly added MADV_HUGEPAGE in the
readahead path.

-- 
Regards
Yafang


      reply	other threads:[~2024-11-14  6:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-13 15:07 Yafang Shao
2024-11-14  4:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-14  6:06   ` Yafang Shao [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALOAHbD0SpHw7eYGPrt7-RqC4S-br1kjme9vcLhyQ7ApEFq5kw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox