From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm, memcg: don't try to kill a process if memcg is not populated
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 11:03:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALOAHbCbLj2tJLVwFwJ=4rfUGCJrSTaMFk6Tr9TJM-KTZuyHkQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALvZod6Aqrg4v763QTR2eH+mK1QCYTwN==_gp+Tz562JjJqoEg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 7:00 AM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 7:35 AM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Recently Shakeel reported a issue which also confused me serveral months
> > earlier. Bellow is his report -
> >
> > Lowering memory.max can trigger an oom-kill if the reclaim does not
> > succeed. However if oom-killer does not find a process for killing, it
> > dumps a lot of warnings.
> >
> > Deleting a memcg does not reclaim memory from it and the memory can
> > linger till there is a memory pressure. One normal way to proactively
> > reclaim such memory is to set memory.max to 0 just before deleting the
> > memcg. However if some of the memcg's memory is pinned by others, this
> > operation can trigger an oom-kill without any process and thus can log a
> > lot un-needed warnings. So, ignore all such warnings from memory.max.
>
> lot *of* un-needed
>
Thanks.
> >
> > [shakeelb@google.com: commit log above]
> >
> > A better way to avoid this issue is to avoid trying to kill a process if
> > memcg is not populated.
> > Note that OOM is different with OOM kill.
>
> different *from*
>
Thanks
> > OOM is a status that the
> > system or memcg is out of memory, while OOM kill is a result that a
> > process inside this memcg is killed when this memcg is in OOM status.
> > That is the same reason why there're both MEMCG_OOM event and
> > MEMCG_OOM_KILL event. If we have already known that there's nothing to
> > kill, i.e. the memcg is not populated, then we don't need to have a try.
>
> need to try
>
Thanks
> I think adding the discussion of memory.high is also useful in the
> commit message. Basically why setting memory.max to 0 is better than
> setting memory.high to 0 before deletion. The reason is remote
> charging.
>
Sure, will add it.
> >
> > Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
> > Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
> > Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
>
> > ---
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index 985edce98491..29afe3df9d98 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -6102,6 +6102,10 @@ static ssize_t memory_max_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
> > }
> >
> > memcg_memory_event(memcg, MEMCG_OOM);
> > +
> > + if (!cgroup_is_populated(memcg->css.cgroup))
> > + break;
> > +
> > if (!mem_cgroup_oom_kill(memcg, GFP_KERNEL, 0))
> > break;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.18.2
> >
--
Thanks
Yafang
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-04 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-02 14:34 [PATCH 0/2] memcg oom: don't try to kill a process if there is no process Yafang Shao
2020-05-02 14:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm, memcg: better name mem_cgroup_out_of_memory() Yafang Shao
2020-05-03 22:20 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-05-02 14:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm, memcg: don't try to kill a process if memcg is not populated Yafang Shao
2020-05-03 22:59 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-05-04 3:03 ` Yafang Shao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALOAHbCbLj2tJLVwFwJ=4rfUGCJrSTaMFk6Tr9TJM-KTZuyHkQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox