linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, Martin Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,  Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	john fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	jolsa@kernel.org,  Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,  bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 05/15] bpf: Fix incorrect mem_cgroup_put
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 08:27:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALOAHbCXfRKDEt7jsUBsf-pQ-A7TpXPxGKYxu_GZN-8BUe2auw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220811154731.3smhom6v4qy2u6rd@google.com>

On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 11:47 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 10:49:13AM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 1:07 AM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 03:18:30PM +0000, Yafang Shao wrote:
> > > > The memcg may be the root_mem_cgroup, in which case we shouldn't put it.
> > >
> > > No, it is ok to put root_mem_cgroup. css_put already handles the root
> > > cgroups.
> > >
> >
> > Ah, this commit log doesn't describe the issue clearly. I should improve it.
> > The issue is that in bpf_map_get_memcg() it doesn't get the objcg if
> > map->objcg is NULL (that can happen if the map belongs to the root
> > memcg), so we shouldn't put the objcg if map->objcg is NULL neither in
> > bpf_map_put_memcg().
>
> Sorry I am still not understanding. We are not 'getting' objcg in
> bpf_map_get_memcg(). We are 'getting' memcg from map->objcg and if that
> is NULL the function is returning root memcg and putting root memcg is
> totally fine.

When the map belongs to root_mem_cgroup, the map->objcg is NULL, right ?
See also bpf_map_save_memcg() and it describes clearly in the comment -

static void bpf_map_save_memcg(struct bpf_map *map)
{
        /* Currently if a map is created by a process belonging to the root
         * memory cgroup, get_obj_cgroup_from_current() will return NULL.
         * So we have to check map->objcg for being NULL each time it's
         * being used.
         */
        map->objcg = get_obj_cgroup_from_current();
}

So for the root_mem_cgroup case, bpf_map_get_memcg() will return
root_mem_cgroup directly without getting its css, right ? See below,

static struct mem_cgroup *bpf_map_get_memcg(const struct bpf_map *map)
{

        if (map->objcg)
                return get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(map->objcg);

        return root_mem_cgroup;   // without css_get(&memcg->css);
}

But it will put the css unconditionally.  See below,

memcg = bpf_map_get_memcg(map);
...
mem_cgroup_put(memcg);

So we should put it *conditionally* as well.

  memcg = bpf_map_get_memcg(map);
   ...
+ if (map->objcg)
       mem_cgroup_put(memcg);

Is it clear to you ?

> Or are you saying that root_mem_cgroup is NULL?
>

No

-- 
Regards
Yafang


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-12  0:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-10 15:18 [PATCH bpf-next 00/15] bpf: Introduce selectable memcg for bpf map Yafang Shao
2022-08-10 15:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/15] bpf: Remove unneeded memset in queue_stack_map creation Yafang Shao
2022-08-10 15:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/15] bpf: Use bpf_map_area_free instread of kvfree Yafang Shao
2022-08-10 15:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/15] bpf: Make __GFP_NOWARN consistent in bpf map creation Yafang Shao
2022-08-10 15:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/15] bpf: Use bpf_map_area_alloc consistently on " Yafang Shao
2022-08-10 15:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/15] bpf: Fix incorrect mem_cgroup_put Yafang Shao
2022-08-10 17:07   ` Shakeel Butt
2022-08-11  2:49     ` Yafang Shao
2022-08-11 15:47       ` Shakeel Butt
2022-08-12  0:27         ` Yafang Shao [this message]
2022-08-12  5:33           ` Muchun Song
2022-08-12 11:25             ` Yafang Shao
2022-08-11 16:48   ` Roman Gushchin
2022-08-12  0:31     ` Yafang Shao
2022-08-10 15:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/15] bpf: Define bpf_map_{get,put}_memcg for !CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM Yafang Shao
2022-08-10 15:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/15] bpf: Call bpf_map_init_from_attr() immediately after map creation Yafang Shao
2022-08-10 15:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/15] bpf: Save memcg in bpf_map_init_from_attr() Yafang Shao
2022-08-10 15:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/15] bpf: Use scoped-based charge in bpf_map_area_alloc Yafang Shao
2022-08-10 15:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/15] bpf: Introduce new helpers bpf_ringbuf_pages_{alloc,free} Yafang Shao
2022-08-10 15:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/15] bpf: Use bpf_map_kzalloc in arraymap Yafang Shao
2022-08-10 15:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/15] bpf: Use bpf_map_kvcalloc in bpf_local_storage Yafang Shao
2022-08-10 15:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/15] mm, memcg: Add new helper get_obj_cgroup_from_cgroup Yafang Shao
2022-08-11 16:16   ` Roman Gushchin
2022-08-12  0:35     ` Yafang Shao
2022-08-12 17:40       ` Roman Gushchin
2022-08-12 23:56         ` Yafang Shao
2022-08-13 18:30           ` Roman Gushchin
2022-08-14  2:35             ` Yafang Shao
2022-08-12 16:57   ` Shakeel Butt
2022-08-13  0:07     ` Yafang Shao
2022-08-10 15:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/15] bpf: Add return value for bpf_map_init_from_attr Yafang Shao
2022-08-10 15:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/15] bpf: Introduce selectable memcg for bpf map Yafang Shao
2022-08-10 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/15] " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALOAHbCXfRKDEt7jsUBsf-pQ-A7TpXPxGKYxu_GZN-8BUe2auw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox