From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm/page-writeback.c: print a warning if the vm dirtiness settings are illogical" (was: Re: [PATCH] mm: print a warning once the vm dirtiness settings is illogical)
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:05:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALOAHbC8DXrk0g-PTizp1rmcXOGATHLWmhBTF20AJHjrXsU0mg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171128104810.5f3lvby64i6x54id@dhcp22.suse.cz>
2017-11-28 18:48 GMT+08:00 Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>:
> On Tue 28-11-17 11:37:23, Jan Kara wrote:
>> On Mon 27-11-17 10:19:39, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> > Andrew,
>> > could you simply send this to Linus. If we _really_ need something to
>> > prevent misconfiguration, which I doubt to be honest, then it should be
>> > thought through much better.
>>
>> What's so bad about the warning? I think warning about such
>> misconfiguration is not a bad thing per se. Maybe it should be ratelimited
>> and certainly the condition is too loose as your example shows but in
>> principle I'm not against it and e.g. making the inequality in the condition
>> strict like:
>>
>> if (unlikely(bg_thresh > thresh))
>>
>> or at least
>>
>> if (unlikely(bg_thresh >= thresh && thresh > 0))
>>
>> would warn about cases where domain_dirty_limits() had to fixup bg_thresh
>> manually to make writeback throttling work and avoid reclaim stalls which
>> is IMHO a sane thing...
>
> If it generates false positives then it is more harmful than useful. And
> even if it doesn't, what is the point? Do we check that other related
> knobs are configured properly? I do not think so, we simply rely on
> admins doing sane things.
Not all admins are good at tuning this.
I don't think every SE knows how to tune vm.dirty_background_bytes and
vm.dirty_background_bytes. Only kernel experts could do that.
At least this warning could help them to learn what happend instead of
knowing nothing.
> Otherwise we would have a lot of warnings like
> that. They would be pain to maintain and I believe the additional value
> is quite dubious.
> --
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-28 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-28 9:54 [PATCH] mm: print a warning once the vm dirtiness settings is illogical Yafang Shao
2017-11-25 16:05 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-11-26 2:24 ` Yafang Shao
2017-11-26 2:42 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-11-26 4:32 ` Yafang Shao
2017-11-26 8:03 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-11-26 8:27 ` Yafang Shao
2017-11-26 8:46 ` Yafang Shao
2017-11-26 10:38 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-11-27 8:06 ` Yafang Shao
2017-11-27 8:21 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-27 8:29 ` Yafang Shao
2017-11-27 8:32 ` Yafang Shao
2017-11-27 8:37 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-27 8:49 ` Yafang Shao
2017-11-27 8:52 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-27 8:54 ` Yafang Shao
2017-11-27 9:04 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-27 9:08 ` Yafang Shao
2017-11-27 8:34 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-27 9:19 ` [PATCH] Revert "mm/page-writeback.c: print a warning if the vm dirtiness settings are illogical" (was: Re: [PATCH] mm: print a warning once the vm dirtiness settings is illogical) Michal Hocko
2017-11-28 3:11 ` Yafang Shao
2017-11-28 6:12 ` Yafang Shao
2017-11-28 7:45 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-28 7:52 ` Yafang Shao
2017-11-28 9:43 ` Yafang Shao
2017-11-28 9:45 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-28 10:09 ` Jan Kara
2017-11-28 10:16 ` Yafang Shao
2017-11-28 10:25 ` Jan Kara
2017-11-28 10:33 ` Yafang Shao
2017-11-28 10:41 ` Jan Kara
2017-11-28 10:44 ` Yafang Shao
2017-11-28 10:37 ` Jan Kara
2017-11-28 10:48 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-28 11:05 ` Yafang Shao [this message]
2017-11-28 11:54 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALOAHbC8DXrk0g-PTizp1rmcXOGATHLWmhBTF20AJHjrXsU0mg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox