linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
To: Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"celinux-dev@lists.celinuxforum.org"
	<celinux-dev@lists.celinuxforum.org>
Subject: Re: [Q] Default SLAB allocator
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:36:44 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALF0-+XLXAh3=OScQ=V0F80ZcnTGjHox68SApOwPUYVvmjdqPw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <507DA245.9050709@am.sony.com>

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com> wrote:
> On 10/16/2012 05:56 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 09:35 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>>
>>> Now, returning to the fragmentation. The problem with SLAB is that
>>> its smaller cache available for kmalloced objects is 32 bytes;
>>> while SLUB allows 8, 16, 24 ...
>>>
>>> Perhaps adding smaller caches to SLAB might make sense?
>>> Is there any strong reason for NOT doing this?
>>
>> I would remove small kmalloc-XX caches, as sharing a cache line
>> is sometime dangerous for performance, because of false sharing.
>>
>> They make sense only for very small hosts.
>
> That's interesting...
>
> It would be good to measure the performance/size tradeoff here.
> I'm interested in very small systems, and it might be worth
> the tradeoff, depending on how bad the performance is.  Maybe
> a new config option would be useful (I can hear the groans now... :-)
>

It might be worth reminding that very small systems can use SLOB
allocator, which does not suffer from this kind of fragmentation.

    Ezequiel

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-16 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-11 14:19 Ezequiel Garcia
2012-10-11 22:42 ` Andi Kleen
2012-10-11 22:59   ` David Rientjes
2012-10-11 23:10     ` Andi Kleen
2012-10-12 12:07       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2012-10-13  9:54         ` David Rientjes
2012-10-13 12:44           ` Ezequiel Garcia
2012-10-16  0:46             ` David Rientjes
2012-10-16 12:35               ` Ezequiel Garcia
2012-10-16 12:56                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-16 18:07                   ` Tim Bird
2012-10-16 18:27                     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2012-10-16 18:44                       ` Tim Bird
2012-10-16 18:49                         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2012-10-16 19:16                       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-17 18:45                         ` Tim Bird
2012-10-17 19:13                           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-17 19:20                             ` Shentino
2012-10-17 20:33                               ` Tim Bird
2012-10-18  0:46                                 ` Shentino
2012-10-17 20:58                             ` Tim Bird
2012-10-17 21:05                               ` Ezequiel Garcia
2012-10-16 18:36                     ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2012-10-16 18:54                       ` Christoph Lameter
2012-10-13  9:51       ` David Rientjes
2012-10-13 15:10         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-16  1:28           ` JoonSoo Kim
2012-10-16  7:23             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-19  0:03           ` JoonSoo Kim
2012-10-19  7:01             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-16  0:45         ` David Rientjes
2012-10-16 18:53           ` Christoph Lameter
2012-10-16 19:02 ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALF0-+XLXAh3=OScQ=V0F80ZcnTGjHox68SApOwPUYVvmjdqPw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=elezegarcia@gmail.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=celinux-dev@lists.celinuxforum.org \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox