From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx131.postini.com [74.125.245.131]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBC546B002B for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:46:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ied10 with SMTP id 10so1286764ied.14 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:46:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1348571229-844-1-git-send-email-elezegarcia@gmail.com> <1348571229-844-2-git-send-email-elezegarcia@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 07:46:50 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slab: Fix kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace() declaration From: Ezequiel Garcia Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Pekka Enberg Cc: David Rientjes , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: >> Yes. I just asked Pekka to revert this patch altogether. >> The original patch was meant to match SLAB and SLUB, and this >> fix should maintain that. But instead I fix it the wrong way. >> >> I'll send another one. > > Okay, I'm now confused and somewhat unhappy. What commits do you want > me to nuke exactly? >>From your slab/tracing topic branch: 1e5965bf1f018cc30a4659fa3f1a40146e4276f6 mm/slab: Fix kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace() declaration Thanks, Ezequiel. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org