From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx130.postini.com [74.125.245.130]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB3356B00B0 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 18:45:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by iagk10 with SMTP id k10so857520iag.14 for ; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 15:45:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <00000139a801aba3-4616277c-d845-4b62-83ec-1a1950b05751-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <00000139a801aba3-4616277c-d845-4b62-83ec-1a1950b05751-000000@email.amazonses.com> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:45:51 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/10] mm: SLxB cleaning and trace accuracy improvement From: Ezequiel Garcia Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Pekka Enberg , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, JoonSoo Kim , Tim Bird , Steven Rostedt , David Rientjes , Glauber Costa Christoph, On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > >> This is the second spin of my patchset to clean SLxB and improve kmem >> trace events accuracy. > > Please redo the patches on top of the patchsets that create > mm/slab_common.c. You will be able to extract a lot more common code and > help the goal of having as much common code as possible. PLease move as > much as possible of the common functions into slab_common.c > Ah, I wasn't sure where to base my patches. I can split this patchset in two and base the SLAB/SLUB commonize part on top of your tree, or perhaps just based everything on top of your tree. Is it this one? http://west.gentwo.org/gitweb/?p=christoph;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/common I have to admit I started thinking of this commonization after seeing your common code patches. Thanks! Ezequiel. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org