From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl0-f71.google.com (mail-pl0-f71.google.com [209.85.160.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9616B027B for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 11:39:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl0-f71.google.com with SMTP id p91-v6so5562090plb.12 for ; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org. [198.145.29.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u75-v6si53185591pfd.328.2018.06.07.08.39.49 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:39:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-it0-f46.google.com (mail-it0-f46.google.com [209.85.214.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D49402089E for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 15:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f46.google.com with SMTP id j186-v6so13188398ita.5 for ; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 08:39:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180607143544.3477-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20180607143544.3477-6-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20180607143544.3477-6-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 08:39:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Documentation/x86: Add CET description Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Yu-cheng Yu Cc: LKML , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Linux-MM , linux-arch , X86 ML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. J. Lu" , "Shanbhogue, Vedvyas" , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Dave Hansen , Jonathan Corbet , Oleg Nesterov , Arnd Bergmann , mike.kravetz@oracle.com On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 7:40 AM Yu-cheng Yu wrote: Fix the subject line, please. This is more than just docs. > > Explain how CET works and the noshstk/noibt kernel parameters. Maybe no_cet_shstk and no_cet_ibt? noshstk sounds like gibberish and people might need a reminder.