linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	 Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	 linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	 Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: perform the mapping_map_writable() check after call_mmap()
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 12:02:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrV1QWSjZR_PQgQdyS8rrg4hhrs1u+FyJh43H-gA7CzkFg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f3aea05c9cc46094b029cbd1138d163c1ae7f9d.1682890156.git.lstoakes@gmail.com>

On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 3:26 PM Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In order for a F_SEAL_WRITE sealed memfd mapping to have an opportunity to
> clear VM_MAYWRITE, we must be able to invoke the appropriate vm_ops->mmap()
> handler to do so. We would otherwise fail the mapping_map_writable() check
> before we had the opportunity to avoid it.

Is there any reason this can't go before patch 3?

If I'm understanding correctly, a comment like the following might
make this a lot more comprehensible:

>
> This patch moves this check after the call_mmap() invocation. Only memfd
> actively denies write access causing a potential failure here (in
> memfd_add_seals()), so there should be no impact on non-memfd cases.
>
> This patch makes the userland-visible change that MAP_SHARED, PROT_READ
> mappings of an F_SEAL_WRITE sealed memfd mapping will now succeed.
>
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217238
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
> ---
>  mm/mmap.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index 646e34e95a37..1608d7f5a293 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -2642,17 +2642,17 @@ unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
>         vma->vm_pgoff = pgoff;
>
>         if (file) {
> -               if (is_shared_maywrite(vm_flags)) {
> -                       error = mapping_map_writable(file->f_mapping);
> -                       if (error)
> -                               goto free_vma;
> -               }
> -
>                 vma->vm_file = get_file(file);
>                 error = call_mmap(file, vma);
>                 if (error)
>                         goto unmap_and_free_vma;
>

/* vm_ops->mmap() may have changed vma->flags.  Check for writability now. */

> +               if (vma_is_shared_maywrite(vma)) {
> +                       error = mapping_map_writable(file->f_mapping);
> +                       if (error)
> +                               goto close_and_free_vma;
> +               }
> +

Alternatively, if anyone is nervous about the change in ordering here,
there could be a whole new vm_op like adjust_vma_flags() that happens
before any of this.

--Andy


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-01 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-30 22:26 [PATCH v2 0/3] permit write-sealed memfd read-only shared mappings Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-04-30 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: drop the assumption that VM_SHARED always implies writable Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-04-30 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: update seal_check_[future_]write() to include F_SEAL_WRITE as well Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-04-30 22:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: perform the mapping_map_writable() check after call_mmap() Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-05-01 19:02   ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2023-05-02  7:57     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-05-16  5:52   ` kernel test robot
2023-10-07 20:07     ` Lorenzo Stoakes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALCETrV1QWSjZR_PQgQdyS8rrg4hhrs1u+FyJh43H-gA7CzkFg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox